The council’s primary focus was the discussion of the water and sewer rate structure. The current rate involves a base charge of approximately $8 per thousand gallons for water and an additional $10 for sewage. The council debated a proposed increase to $30 per thousand gallons, a significant hike aimed at covering rising costs. The necessity for these changes was underscored by the need to implement them before December 31, to avoid a $150 additional charge on water bills that would commence in January.

One council member expressed frustration over the lack of communication from the finance committee, emphasizing the importance of understanding rate implications before voting. The member highlighted constituent dissatisfaction with current rates and sought clarity on how Milltown’s rates compared to other municipalities. They mentioned that while some towns calculate sewage charges based on winter usage, Milltown’s circumstances limit the ability to charge commercial users more due to the borough’s lack of substantial commercial presence.

The council also discussed infrastructure concerns, particularly regarding lead service lines. There was a previous suggestion of issuing bonds to fund these replacements, allowing residents to pay over time as a tax lien. However, the immediate priority remained the water rates, as current rates had not changed despite rising bills due to the existing rate structure.

Complexity arose from the co-mingling of the borough’s water and sewer funds, which added intricacies to financial management. A council member called for a plan to encourage discussion and collaboration among all members, given the finance committee’s inactivity. Another highlighted that setting water rates requires detailed calculations, not simple arithmetic, prompting a focused discussion among finance committee members before the next meeting.

The potential upgrade to new water meter technology was also on the agenda. The council discussed a recent contract with a company specializing in meter replacements, promising enhanced billing accuracy and cost efficiency, with a 20-year warranty. This upgrade aligns with ongoing efforts to manage water resources more effectively.

Apart from water rates, historic preservation was a significant topic. Randy Ruth from the Milltown Historic Preservation Committee presented on efforts to move the historic Raritan River Railroad Freight Station. Despite past funding challenges, the committee remains focused on securing grants for this initiative, aiming to transform the site into a community asset with features like tree plantings, pathways, and a nature trail. Ruth stressed the necessity of municipal support for grant applications and community engagement to shape the site’s future.

The Environmental Commission also provided an update, highlighting successful events and projects like pollinator gardens. They reported financial constraints, with an annual budget of $900 limiting outreach and operational efforts. The commission called for increased funding to expand sustainability education and community involvement, expressing gratitude for the support from borough officials and residents.

The council meeting also covered various municipal updates. The authorization of payments for municipal obligations, including a $33,000 payment for a municipal audit and other legal expenses, was discussed. The council processed resolutions efficiently, with only one dissenting vote on a particular measure.

In public comments, residents raised concerns over water rate increases and lead pipe replacements, seeking direction on whom to contact for more information. An issue involving an ongoing dispute with a neighbor and the borough’s handling of the situation was also brought up, highlighting frustrations over delayed court dates.

The introduction of a community award, “Pillar of Light,” aimed at recognizing outstanding residents, was proposed by a council member. This initiative intends to promote volunteerism and acknowledge selfless contributions within the town.

Finally, discussions on consolidating December meetings into one session due to the holiday season took place. Concerns were raised that doing so might hinder the adoption of the water rate ordinance before year-end.