0:00The most pressing topic was the proposed Ordinance 24-1548, which aimed to establish a flag policy for borough buildings. This ordinance sought to limit displayed flags to the American flag, the New Jersey state flag, and a few other specific flags, while prohibiting any additional flags. The policy spurred a debate, with strong opinions expressed by both council members and residents.

Art Simons from Brook Drive questioned the specifics of Article 89, seeking clarification on the changes being made. The council responded that the ordinance would set guidelines for which flags could be displayed at borough buildings. Neil Marado, a resident from Van L Avenue, voiced his opposition to the ordinance, citing concerns that the human relations committee had not been consulted in the drafting process. Marado argued that the ordinance seemed reactionary, crafted in response to requests for Juneteenth and pride flags, rather than as a result of thoughtful discussion.

Marado emphasized the importance of community engagement and transparency. He referenced a positive memory from his daughters’ school days, highlighting the benefits of cultural sharing and community bonding. Marado urged the council to adopt a more welcoming approach rather than restricting flag displays.

25:00The council’s discussion on the flag ordinance revealed differing opinions on the role of the Human Relations Committee (HRC) and the need for public input. A council member referenced various flag ordinances from other cities, including San Jose, Sparta, and Boston, noting that municipalities can regulate flag flying on public property. The council member cited a Supreme Court case, Shurtleff v. City of Boston, which ruled in favor of allowing a Christian flag to be displayed at City Hall due to the lack of city control over flag messages, making them private speech rather than government speech.

Another council member questioned whether Milltown should follow the examples of these cities or adopt a unique stance. There was a consensus among some members that the council should prioritize the town’s interests over the recommendations of the HRC. One council member asserted that the HRC should not dictate the council’s decisions.

The discussion also highlighted a perceived disconnect between the HRC’s agenda and the residents’ priorities. One council member stressed the importance of soliciting input from the HRC before voting on the ordinance, arguing that their advisory role should not be overlooked. Another member remarked on the necessity of involving committees like the HRC to ensure their expertise is effectively utilized.

0:00Despite these differing viewpoints, the council moved to vote on the ordinance, with the motion passing despite some dissent. The decision underscored the ongoing tension between community representation and historical acknowledgment within the borough.

41:38Following the flag ordinance discussion, the council addressed other issues, including the authorization of municipal obligations and the consent agenda, which contained multiple routine resolutions. Among these was a resolution concerning the popup party prevention and response initiative grant. The acting mayor explained that the grant would reimburse the borough for policing costs associated with large gatherings facilitated through social media, which had led to financial challenges in surrounding areas. The council members expressed their support for the resolution, leading to its adoption without further debate.

58:31In the realm of public safety, the council discussed the need for crossing guards for the upcoming school year and the placement of message boards on Main Street to remind drivers of Milltown’s walking district status. The police department encouraged residents to apply for the part-time crossing guard positions.

1:13:00The council also reviewed a report from an architect regarding a building’s potential for renovation. The executive summary deemed the building impractical for public facility use due to the need for extensive site improvements. Concerns were raised about the building’s current state, subject to vandalism, and described as an “attractive nuisance.”

1:26:47Councilman Potter introduced the idea of transitioning from the current emergency alert system, Nixel, to the Civic Ready emergency alert system, which offers more capabilities at a lower cost. The council encouraged Chief Johnson to explore this new system and consider phasing out Nixel.

During the public comment portion, residents raised various concerns, including the omission of the Milltown flag from the flag ordinance and the handling of communications and confidentiality by council members. Keith Cook from North Brook Drive requested the council to revisit the ordinance to allow the display of the Milltown flag, particularly with Milltown Day approaching on September 28.