The conversation revolved around the operational capacity of the utility and the implications for residents, highlighting the utility’s manpower limitations and the unused Smart Meters due to resource constraints. The importance of addressing state-mandated programs and compliance requirements, such as water quality parameters and infrastructure replacement, was acknowledged, citing potential fines and the necessity of strategic management of the utility’s financial and operational challenges.

Strategies for funding the service line replacement were debated, focusing on exploring grant opportunities, low-interest loans, and seeking principal forgiveness from state-level programs to alleviate the financial burden. However, concerns were raised about the eligibility for grants based on income levels and the complex nature of securing external funding. Legal limitations related to spending public money on private property posed additional challenges for implementing alternative financing mechanisms.

The council also discussed the broader context of regulatory changes and evolving state mandates related to lead and galvanized service line replacements, deliberating on the shifting requirements and potential consequences for non-compliance. Public commentary provided insights into various programs and initiatives aimed at addressing water quality and lead mitigation.

The issue of water rate increases was raised by residents, with particular concern about the impact on senior citizens and single occupant households. The necessity of the rate increase to cover operational costs was explained, sparking a debate about whether the increase should be temporary or ongoing. The potential impact on residents and the need to address the immediate budget shortfall were acknowledged, along with the urgency to work on a future plan for the water budget.

The meeting also included a debate over the water rates, with former councilman Nick Lagotti raising concerns about substantial raises given to water utility employees. Councilman Felipe Zambrana outlined the financial challenges, including a deficit of $344,000 for the year, and the anticipated future shortfalls. The need for the rate increase to generate revenue and the variations in how the increase would affect different water users were discussed, as well as the allocation of funds and the decision-making process.

A public hearing for two ordinances was held, one on residential lead paint testing for rental properties and another to amend water rates. The latter sparked discussion about the lack of public debate prior to the ordinance’s introduction and the suggestion of a sunset clause. Residents raised concerns about the financial burden on fixed-income individuals and advocated for the exploration of available programs to assist them. The ordinance was approved following public comments.

The council discussed the need for a plan to address the aging infrastructure and water system issues in Milltown, with concerns about the potential takeover of the town by the county or state if these issues were not properly addressed. The introduction of several ordinances, including amendments to building and housing codes, comprehensive development ordinances, and a bond ordinance for the acquisition of a pumper truck and fire equipment, was also a topic of debate.

Further discussions included the purchase of a new fire truck, the reappropriation of excess bond proceeds, and the appointment of members to the Mount Laurel subcommittee. The introduction of the 2024 Municipal budget was a significant item, with a focus on the potential tax increase and the implications for the average homeowner. The council debated the need for a formal budget presentation and the request for regular visits by the chairman of the Ford Avenue commission and the school administrator to discuss borough taxes invested into the school system.

Updates from borough committees and departments were provided, including the Department of Public Works’ progress on road paving and information about the upcoming 4th of July event. A resident’s petition and concerns about parking availability, site maintenance for buildings, and the display of Juneteenth and Pride flags were also discussed.