The discussion on the data center ban drew discussion and participation. It was marked by diverse perspectives, including opposition from an attorney representing entities involved in a data center project. Despite the objection, the council maintained the time limit, allowing each participant to present their views.

A witness with expertise in digital infrastructure provided insights on addressing the ordinance’s concerns through innovative technologies. He highlighted the use of solid oxide fuel cells and closed-loop cooling systems that could mitigate energy consumption and water usage concerns. The witness also emphasized the potential for repurposing waste heat from data centers for residential or agricultural use, noting successful implementations in other cities.

In contrast, public comments favored the ban, with speakers expressing concerns about environmental impacts, including increased electric bills and potential deterioration of air and water quality. Riannan Clark presented testimonies from residents in areas already affected by data centers, stressing that such impacts disproportionately affect low-income communities like those in South Jersey.

Further resistance to data centers was echoed by Kaylee Henry from the Climate Revolution Action Network, who commended the council for considering the ordinance and urged them to prioritize community well-being over external interests.

In addition to the data center debate, the council meeting addressed the 2026 municipal budget presentation by Chief Financial Officer Trisha McGee. The proposed budget stands at $42 million. McGee explained the necessity for a balanced budget and outlined the constraints on revenue increases. She highlighted an 8.48-cent tax increase, though discrepancies in reported figures prompted public questions.

The budget discussion revealed that the city plans to use $7 million of its surplus to offset tax increases. Despite this, the tax levy constitutes the majority of revenue sources, with a portion allocated to rising health insurance costs following a transition from state healthcare. The budget also accounted for unforeseen expenses, such as a 27th payroll cycle and increased overtime funding for emergency services.

Public comments on the budget expressed frustration over a lack of transparency and clarity regarding financial decisions. Residents raised concerns about a $1.9 million budget error and potential tax rate hikes, emphasizing the need for more discussions among commissioners to address these issues.

Lastly, the council approved several resolutions focused on local projects and community safety. Notably, they authorized a special assessment of municipal liens and voted to advertise for bids for the Gisinger Avenue Water Improvements Project. Additionally, the council passed a resolution to apply for up to $100,000 in first-generation funds from the New Jersey Urban Enterprise Zone Authority for installing cameras in the Millville Urban Enterprise Zone, aimed at enhancing public safety.