The town is required to zone for at least 2,461 multifamily units, with an average density of 50 units per acre, within a designated 50-acre area.

Participants expressed concerns over Milton’s designation as a rapid transit community and the implications for its zoning regulations. The Supreme Judicial Court had upheld the statute, but the town did not submit a compliant zoning district application by the state deadline. This failure has rendered Milton ineligible for numerous grant programs and raised the specter of enforcement action from the attorney general.

The meeting included a detailed presentation on the town’s zoning plans, which have been adjusted since the previous 2023 warrant article. Notable changes involve the removal of certain districts and revisions to the boundaries of others, with a shift in focus towards the Elliot Street corridor. The town’s zoning proposal aims to align with state metrics while accommodating necessary density.

The loss of over $1 million in grant funding due to the town’s non-compliance was a point of contention. A speaker emphasized that compliance could have been achieved by signing a necessary document, but the failure to do so has resulted in financial setbacks. The speaker questioned the Planning Board’s stance on compliance and urged immediate action to rectify the situation.

Concerns about traffic congestion and safety were raised, particularly regarding plans for Granite Avenue South and the Elliot Street corridor. Residents highlighted the potential impact of adding housing units in these areas, noting existing infrastructure challenges. The exclusion of Granite Avenue South from future plans was influenced by traffic concerns, as the area is already one of the most congested in East Milton.

Discussions also touched on the potential for development on the paper mill site, with questions about its economic viability given access issues and existing brownfield conditions.

The Select Board’s decision-making process was scrutinized, with calls for clearer communication and action. Residents expressed frustration over the lack of transparency and the board’s handling of zoning compliance.

The complexities of managing zoning and development within Milton were evident, as residents voiced concerns about the implications of ongoing developments, parking challenges, and the need for updated planning frameworks. The town’s housing production plan has expired, and efforts are underway to engage consultants for its revision.