The board’s decision to approve the tree removal on Highland Street was driven by concerns about the tree’s invasive root system damaging a nearby stone wall. The application, presented by Tasha Wells and supported by the Branch Lane Treewood representative, received backing from the historical commission, which acknowledged the necessity of protecting the wall despite the general discouragement of tree removal. A neighbor, Garwin, praised the Wells’ efforts to enhance their property and expressed concern about imposing additional fees on them for the tree fund, arguing that they had already made contributions to the local environment.

Attention then shifted to the East Milton Fire Station project, where Brian Walsh, chairman of the Fire Station Building Committee, provided background on the need to upgrade the fire stations, particularly due to outdated technology and operational challenges at the East Milton location. Walsh emphasized the urgency of relocating the station to meet national response time standards, highlighting a property next to St. Agatha’s rectory as an ideal location due to its clear sight lines and level lot.

Concerns about traffic safety and the removal of a tree obstructing the proposed station site’s exit were prominent in the meeting. Walsh addressed the environmental impact of tree removal, suggesting a contribution of $2,000 to offset the loss. Residents voiced worries about increased traffic and safety, particularly in relation to the nearby elementary school and during school pick-up times. The board discussed implementing a cobblestone apron to maintain traffic moderation while allowing fire trucks to navigate the area.

The meeting also delved into the implications of a proposed fire station project on Adam Street, specifically regarding the integration of bike lanes and neighborhood safety. Questions arose about the relevance of existing traffic data in light of ongoing developments and the impact of the Falcone project and new Flatly building in East Milton. The board weighed the urgency of fire station upgrades against potential environmental impacts and logistical challenges posed by tree removal and state projects.

A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to discussing bylaw amendments related to signs, focusing on definitions and classifications, including non-conforming and protected signs. The conversation highlighted confusion over the interpretation of terms like “protected” and the implications for ownership changes. The committee acknowledged the need for a coherent interpretation of sign regulations to prevent businesses from maintaining outdated signage due to bylaw loopholes.

During the discussion on sign regulations, concerns were raised about the processing time for sign permit applications and whether the current 30-day timeframe was sufficient. The need for professional expertise within the sign review committee was emphasized to ensure that signs meet community standards. Participants also debated the practicality of prohibiting plastic materials for sidewalk signs, considering their advantages in terms of handling and weather resistance.