02:46The most notable portion of the Milton Select Board meeting revolved around the site plan approval for Two Elliott Street. The proposal, which had been under review since April, aimed to transform a vacant banking facility into a neighborhood-oriented quick-service food market. This development will maintain the existing structure’s footprint, utilize available street parking, and include outdoor patio seating areas. Notably, the design features a pergola with a louvered roof, intended to enhance the market’s aesthetic appeal and functional use throughout the year.

10:34The conversation about the pergola became a focal point, as board members deliberated over its design to ensure it would complement the existing architectural style of the building. Concerns were raised about avoiding an industrial appearance, with particular attention given to the details of the columns and beams. One board member emphasized the importance of the design harmonizing with the existing structure, stating, “I just want it looking too industrial.” This led to a consensus favoring a design depicted in an image from the project presentation, which featured detailed elements that aligned with the board’s aesthetic preferences.

Further scrutiny was applied to the screen type for the pergola, with members focusing on ensuring it would not resemble a solid metal structure. The proposed “86% screen” was deemed acceptable, providing visibility while offering protection from wind and bugs. This detail was confirmed for inclusion in updated presentation materials, and the board expressed satisfaction with the pergola’s final design.

24:51Following the discussion on the pergola, the board moved to close the public hearing on the Two Elliott Street site plan. A motion to approve the site plan as amended was seconded and passed unanimously. The board expressed appreciation for the efforts involved, with remarks such as “Great job. Thank you.”

26:26In addition to the Two Elliott Street project, the board addressed procedural matters concerning other agenda items. Notably, the application for the 75 River Street project was postponed due to a board member’s absence. The board had not received the necessary documentation for this project, resulting in its rescheduling for June 12. Similarly, a project concerning 270 River Street was deferred to the same date. A request was made for prompt dissemination of the new language regarding these changes for documentation purposes.

27:48The meeting concluded with a transition to executive session, where the board discussed matters related to open meeting law complaints and pending litigation, as allowed under Massachusetts General Laws. The sensitive nature of these topics required privacy to avoid jeopardizing the board’s legal positions. A motion to move into executive session was passed unanimously, and members were informed that the board would not reconvene in open session after the closed discussion.