1:54:31The meeting began with a focus on the MBTA zoning regulations, which dominated the conversation as members grappled with the implications for the town. The board addressed concerns regarding the integration of multifamily zoning districts in compliance with General Law chapter 48, section 3A. A process was established to submit an action plan at least 90 days prior to a vote, with the Executive Office of Housing and Livable Communities (EOHLC) responsible for reviewing submissions. However, there was uncertainty about the necessity of the action plan, as previous submissions by other communities had been deemed unsatisfactory.

A critical point of discussion was the potential conflict between zoning regulations and infrastructure capacity, specifically concerning water and wastewater services. The board highlighted the Department of Public Works’ (DPW) ability to deny projects lacking sufficient utility infrastructure. The proposed Falcone project in East Milton Square, consisting of 99 units, was cited as an example of the challenges faced when infrastructure capacity does not align with development proposals.

1:04:52The conversation shifted towards addressing the implications of the multifamily housing definition, particularly regarding density calculations and their effect on local neighborhoods. There was a proposal to revise the definition to classify three dwelling units on the same lot as multifamily. This suggestion was met with agreement, as members recognized the need to protect single-family and two-family homes.

The board also discussed the need for modifications in terminology, such as changing “units” to “acres” in guidelines to better reflect neighborhood contexts. The conversation emphasized the importance of infill housing in areas with smaller lots, recognizing that existing guidelines favor larger developments that may not be feasible given the local layout. This led to a consensus on the necessity of narrative comments regarding the trolley’s impact on potential housing developments.

1:27:15In addition to zoning issues, the meeting addressed the integration of affordability metrics within the zoning framework. A reference was made to Boston’s approach, which includes economic analyses to support affordability standards. The idea of using a target percentage for Milton was debated, with acknowledgment of the challenges in mandating such a goal. Discussions highlighted the importance of aligning with neighboring communities to ensure consistency in development thresholds requiring affordability provisions.

2:45:51The meeting concluded with a focus on community engagement, as the board recognized the importance of public input in shaping future planning initiatives. There was a consensus on scheduling a public forum to facilitate dialogue. The board acknowledged the challenges of balancing regulatory requirements with community sentiments, as participants navigated the complexities of urban planning in light of new mandates from the MBTA act.