The Gardener School project took center stage with Chris Fendon of Viking Development presenting a revised design plan, which shifted from a one-story to a two-story structure. This change was necessary to accommodate non-ambulatory children, providing egress options on both levels. The new design strategically integrated the building into the hillside, reducing its visibility from Route 138 and decreasing the site disturbance significantly. These revisions were well-received by the board, who noted the reduction in environmental impact, including a decrease in the number of trees affected.

Board members engaged deeply with Fendon, discussing operational aspects like natural light and the building’s integration with the landscape. While concerns about retaining walls and material choices remained, the general sentiment was supportive, with the board appreciating the efforts to address previous criticisms and align the project with community aesthetics.

Traffic analysis related to the Gardener School project revealed challenges and potential solutions. Scott Thorton from Vaness and Associates provided updated traffic counts indicating minor changes in traffic volume and delay times. The board explored options such as roundabouts and traffic signal timing adjustments to improve flow and safety, acknowledging the concerns of nearby residents about increased traffic and potential delays.

The meeting also delved into zoning discussions, particularly focusing on the Elliot Street Corridor. The board reviewed proposals to adjust minimum lot sizes and increase housing density, reflecting on the implications for community development and historical preservation. They weighed the potential impacts on townwide unit capacity and explored alternative subdistricts to distribute housing density more effectively.

Accessory dwelling units (ADUs) were another focal point, with discussions about the implications of new legislation and the need for clear zoning definitions. Residents expressed concerns over the tight legislative timelines and the potential for non-conforming structures to be converted into ADUs. The board recognized the necessity of aligning design standards for ADUs with existing guidelines for primary residences, emphasizing a thoughtful approach to zoning amendments.

The board also reviewed zoning map amendments, addressing discrepancies and ensuring that the maps accurately reflect zoning bylaws. The conversation highlighted the need for a structured approach to zoning amendments.