A major portion of the discussion was devoted to affordable housing policies within Milton’s MBTA districts. The board evaluated several policy options, each with different implications for affordability and the number of housing units produced. One focus was the town’s existing requirement that 15% of new housing units be affordable at 80% of the Area Median Income (AMI). The board considered the potential benefits and challenges of adjusting this requirement to better address the town’s housing needs while ensuring economic viability for developers. Various scenarios and policy options were explored, including maintaining the current 15% requirement and considering a lower percentage with deeper affordability levels at 60% AMI. The board acknowledged the importance of balancing these factors to achieve a “safe harbor” status, protecting the town from certain legal challenges while meeting state mandates.

The board’s deliberations also included a review of zoning amendment articles and the impact of recent feedback from the Attorney General. The focus was on site plan reviews and the regulations surrounding Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs). The board discussed the need for clarity in the bylaws, particularly concerning do protected uses, which include religious and nonprofit educational establishments. The conversation highlighted the importance of aligning local regulations with state definitions and ensuring that the bylaws do not inadvertently hinder protected uses. The board acknowledged the complexities involved in drafting effective regulations and emphasized the need for transparency and public engagement in the process.

The meeting also touched on procedural and administrative aspects of the planning process, particularly regarding the handling of applications and the roles of various town departments. The board discussed the importance of establishing clear guidelines for submitting and reviewing applications, including the need for a streamlined process that minimizes confusion and delays. The discussion included suggestions for improving communication between the planning department and the town clerk’s office, as well as the need for a transparent approach to handling non-compliance notices.

The board’s focus on zoning and housing policy was underscored by ongoing concerns about the town’s financial management and capital planning. Members discussed the categorization of expenses, particularly the distinction between capital expenditures and maintenance costs. The dialogue highlighted the need for strategic allocation of resources to address urgent operational needs while balancing long-term planning objectives.

The board recognized the need to enhance communication with residents about ongoing projects and initiatives, including efforts to track and display the status of various developments.