The most concern addressed during the meeting was the MPD’s non-cooperation with the Office of City Auditor. The auditor detailed significant delays in receiving updates and participation from MPD staff, which have hindered ongoing audit processes. There was a notable lack of responsiveness from individual officers, and the involvement of the Police Federation was cited as a contributing factor to these delays. The auditor described an instance where an investigator’s cooperation was compromised due to external coaching, raising alarms about the influence of the Police Federation.

Committee members expressed strong support for the auditor’s office and emphasized the critical nature of compliance with audit processes. The need for MPD to adhere to audit requests was underscored, with suggestions for drafting a formal communication to MPD to highlight the importance of cooperation and truthfulness. The committee also discussed the potential need for broader accountability measures, such as a formal mechanism for consequences when departments fail to cooperate.

Beyond the immediate issues with MPD, the meeting tackled broader audit topics, including the introduction of a Workforce Optimization and Comparative Benchmarking Study. This study aims to assess staffing levels across city departments, comparing them with similar cities to identify potential cost savings. The initiative, described as a valuable investment, received unanimous support from the committee.

Another discussion concerned the establishment of an independent review function for high-impact public safety cases. The need for a systematic approach to handling such cases was emphasized, particularly in light of the limited capacity of the current city auditor’s office. The conversation entertained the possibility of creating an Office of Inspector General to ensure independence and effectiveness in reviewing these cases. This proposal aimed to address the emotional weight and public demand for accountability in high-profile incidents.

The meeting also examined amendments to the city audit processes and standards. These changes included updates to reflect a new mission statement emphasizing independence and the inclusion of Generally Accepted Government Auditing Standards alongside International Internal Audit Standards. The proposed amendments aimed to streamline language for clarity and ensure that the audit committee is promptly informed of any non-cooperation by auditees.

Detailed discussions took place about the approval process for an annual risk-based audit plan, with a focus on maintaining flexibility and ensuring the audit committee is aware of significant scope changes during audits. The potential for unresolved past findings to be escalated to the committee was also debated.

Concerns were raised regarding access to documents from organizations receiving city funds, with discussions centered on balancing audit requirements with confidentiality protections. The committee also reviewed the nomination process for audit-related positions.