Councilmember Robin Wonsley underscored the urgency of the review, citing statistics that highlight the vulnerability of Indigenous women in the state. Between 2010 and 2019, Indigenous women, who make up only 1% of Minnesota’s population, accounted for 9% of all murdered women and girls. Wonsley stressed the importance of the council’s action in response to calls from Lussier’s family and the community, who have expressed dissatisfaction with the MPD’s response. “Calls from the community and Allison’s family saying MPD failed them simply cannot be ignored,” she stated.

Vice Chair Aurin Chowdhury echoed Wonsley’s sentiments, recognizing the continued activism of Lussier’s family. Chowdhury acknowledged the broader state-level efforts to protect Indigenous women and commended the community members present, advocating for transparency and accountability. The council’s approval of the after-action review demonstrated a collective acknowledgment of the gravity of Lussier’s case and its broader implications for the Indigenous community.

The meeting also featured a farewell to Attorney Erik Nilsson. Council members took turns honoring Nilsson’s contributions, particularly his work in transitioning rental housing code enforcement from criminal to civil prosecution and his collaboration on the park dedication ordinance that raised over $30 million for park improvements. Colleagues praised Nilsson for his dedication, professional integrity, and mentorship, sharing personal anecdotes that highlighted his impact on both their professional and personal lives.

Nilsson addressed the council, expressing gratitude for the support and reflecting on his tenure as the most rewarding period of his life. “I’ve been a crazy cocktail of emotions,” he admitted, acknowledging the emotional toll of leaving a long-held position. His remarks underscored the significance of fostering relationships and supporting each other within the council.

In addition to these topics, the council engaged in discussions about executive orders and their potential impacts on the city. These included orders related to immigration, sanctuary cities, gender identity, and diversity, equity, and inclusion (DEI) programs. The City Attorney’s Office provided a comprehensive presentation, clarifying the legal challenges and broader implications associated with these federal actions.

The executive orders have raised concerns regarding federal funding, as certain orders threaten financial assistance to cities deemed noncompliant with immigration directives. Discussions also highlighted the executive order on gender identity, which limits protections for transgender individuals, particularly affecting education and healthcare sectors. Council members deliberated on the potential conflicts between these orders and Minnesota state laws, especially those protecting against discrimination based on gender identity.

The council also approved a resolution authorizing the City Attorney’s Office to participate in amicus briefs related to federal litigation, particularly concerning birthright citizenship. This measure aims to ensure the city can respond swiftly to federal actions impacting its legal interests. The resolution allows for quick action if necessary while keeping the council informed of litigation activities.

Further discussions touched on several committee reports and legislative proposals, including a resolution for AV broadcasting equipment in the council chambers and a proposal to embed a social worker within the Minneapolis Emergency Communications Center. The Business, Housing, and Zoning Committee addressed a liquor license application and a hate crime prevention guidelines resolution, while the Climate and Infrastructure Committee emphasized community engagement in plans for a pedestrian plaza at George Floyd Square.

The meeting concluded with discussions on police training services and the importance of effective training methods in alignment with a settlement agreement. Council members expressed satisfaction with the training provider’s methods.