0:17The discussion centered around longstanding issues related to off-duty police assignments, particularly the perception that a “pay-to-play” system has been in place. Concerns were raised by Vice Chair Wonsley about the city’s reliance on off-duty officers, despite reported staffing shortages impacting crime response capabilities. The committee explored the implications of a buy-back program previously approved for a wealthy neighborhood, which had sparked community frustration.

Wonsley highlighted the need for regulatory action, referencing a 2019 police off-duty audit that included corrective measures. The audit underscored the city’s capacity to recoup costs associated with off-duty work through fees. Despite a previously incomplete response from the administration regarding the program’s details, Wonsley had spearheaded efforts to draft the ordinance, supported by her colleagues. The ordinance is now set to enable the city to charge fees for using city-owned resources related to off-duty work, potentially recouping substantial funds. For instance, in 2024, the city could have recovered approximately $1.4 million if fees had been applied to off-duty assignments.

During the public hearing, Council Member Rainville probed the ordinance’s impact on off-duty officer use, emphasizing their role in emergencies. Wonsley acknowledged a lack of data from the Minneapolis Police Department (MPD) on off-duty transitions to active duty, highlighting an area needing further exploration. She emphasized the ordinance’s focus on cost recovery rather than altering hiring practices.

The committee also examined the broader context of officer wellness, with discussions pointing to the negative effects of additional shifts on officers’ well-being and family time. The importance of addressing officer fatigue in maintaining public safety was underscored, with calls for a balanced approach to staffing and resource allocation.

20:22In conjunction with these discussions, the meeting included a dialogue on the need for improved tracking capabilities regarding off-duty use of police resources, such as squad cars. Establishing a fee structure to cover costs related to vehicle wear and tear and fuel was considered essential. Investments in tracking infrastructure were deemed necessary to enhance oversight.

The historical context of off-duty squad car usage was shared, noting its evolution from being stationed at high schools to broader applications like traffic control. Concerns were raised about potential misuse for personal convenience, with calls for justified usage to prevent wastefulness and maintain public perception.

0:17The ordinance received unanimous support, paving the way for a detailed assessment of off-duty and active duty time in fee calculations. The collaboration involved multiple departments, including police and legal teams, highlighting the complexity and importance of the legislative effort.

20:22Beyond the ordinance, the committee addressed public health and safety initiatives. This included extending a grant for naloxone education and accepting federal funding to combat regional drug threats. A specific inquiry was made regarding the naloxone grant amount, originally set at $250,000, though current figures remained unclear.

Additionally, the committee tackled a walk-on item concerning winter safety plans for unsheltered individuals, emphasizing emergency preparedness in extreme weather. There was a call for updating the emergency operations manual to better reflect the community’s needs, particularly for the homeless population during severe weather conditions. Committee members expressed a willingness to collaborate with various government levels to address homelessness challenges, even beyond the city’s direct responsibilities.