The meeting’s most discussion revolved around the pilot program for autonomous delivery devices at the University of Minnesota. This initiative, featuring delivery robots operating at an average speed of four miles per hour, has stirred public concern. Testimonies from representatives of Teamsters Local 320 highlighted the potential impact on workers, with fears of job displacement and exploitation through technological advances. Ryan Malloy, a shop steward and grounds worker, emphasized the need for proactive regulation to protect union workers, arguing that the university should seek permits and permissions from both the Teamsters and government bodies before implementing such technologies.

Justin Roden, another representative, criticized the “move fast and break things mentality” associated with the rapid adoption of autonomous devices. He expressed skepticism about the program. Jackson Kerr, a business agent, added context by citing increased disciplinary actions against workers since Chartwells took over the university’s dining services. He claimed that a senior member of Chartwells had stated, “Robots are better than humans,” pointing to a potential agenda to replace union labor with automation.

The committee’s discussion also touched on the technical aspects of the pilot program. The delivery robots are currently limited to servicing 40 university-owned buildings, and maintenance is conducted by engineering students, presenting educational opportunities. The program, running from September to August 25, has revealed an average of 513 deliveries per month, with a city regulation speed limit of five miles per hour. The city is considering future expansion and the inclusion of drone-based deliveries.

Council members expressed concerns about the potential monopolization of delivery services and the need for regulatory measures to protect various stakeholders. The conversation also highlighted differences in fee structures and operational guidelines compared to other cities, such as San Francisco and Austin, Texas, which have adopted varying approaches to regulating such technologies.

Following the discussion on autonomous delivery devices, the committee turned its attention to efforts to combat childhood lead poisoning. Jonathan Rossel from the Lead and Healthy Homes team presented data showing that 77% of children affected by lead poisoning came from BIPOC communities, with most cases in rental units in North and South Central Minneapolis. The program, supported by funding from the American Rescue Plan Act, conducted over 700 inspections and identified more than 600 properties with lead-based paint hazards.

The efforts have resulted in awarding over $3 million in grants for lead hazard reduction repairs. The proactive inspections target high-risk properties, and the program has worked with over 100 properties, with about 20 moving into contracted services for repairs. The approach includes partnerships with the Minnesota Department of Health to address lead exposure proactively.

Council members inquired about the scope and cost implications of lead abatement, particularly the replacement of old windows, and emphasized the need for local funding amidst uncertainties surrounding federal support.

Additionally, the meeting included a presentation on the 340B Drug Pricing Program, which allows Abbott Northwestern Hospital to provide discounted medications to uninsured and underinsured patients. The program supports several community initiatives, including the Early Youth Eye Care Program, which conducts vision screenings in Minneapolis public schools, and environmental efforts like the installation of electric vehicle charging stations and a solar roof project.

The committee members expressed support for these initiatives and recognized the importance of the partnership between the city and Abbott Northwestern Hospital. Concerns were raised about potential federal changes to the 340B program and their impact on community health projects.