38:44The discussion on chickens in residential zones was prompted by growing interest from the community. The proposal under consideration suggested allowing chickens on lots of at least one acre, with a maximum of three chickens per household. They would be required to remain in enclosed spaces to prevent them from wandering into neighboring properties. This proposal aimed to introduce the change gradually, allowing the community to evaluate its impact over time.

34:08One council member expressed surprise at St. Bonafacius, a neighboring community, which permits chickens without issues. The council member noted that chicken ownership often serves educational purposes, particularly for teaching children responsibility. The sentiment was that if managed properly, chickens could coexist peacefully with neighbors, much like more common pets such as dogs.

Debate ensued over the proposed one-acre minimum lot size for chicken ownership. Some council members advocated for reducing the requirement to half an acre, thereby increasing accessibility for residents interested in raising chickens. They argued that such changes would not pose significant challenges, emphasizing that those who choose to keep chickens are generally committed and responsible.

42:44Opposing views were also presented. Concerns were raised about altering regulations based on individual preferences, with some members cautioning against making ordinance changes without broader community consensus.

36:35As the council weighed these considerations, they acknowledged that Homeowners Associations (HOAs) might restrict chicken ownership, which could limit the ordinance’s applicability. Additionally, the council discussed the potential need for a permitting system to ensure compliance and address any neighbor complaints effectively. The idea of a “soft launch” was introduced, allowing the ordinance to be implemented with minimal regulations initially, to be revisited based on community feedback.

03:36In parallel, the council covered several infrastructure projects, notably the approval of Task Order 11 related to the 2026 street improvement projects. This project includes a mill and overlay for various roads, with some full-depth removal in specific areas. The council clarified that properties previously assessed for road improvements would not be reassessed.

11:57Another infrastructure topic was the water main project across school property. Task Order 15 with A2S was introduced, which would cover construction phase services for the water main installation. The project is projected to cost up to $43,500 for management services, with the school contributing financially through a cooperative agreement. The city plans to issue bonds for the project, with the school repaying its share over 20 years.

16:23The council also addressed an emergency sewer project involving a leaking manhole below Lake Minnetonka’s high water line. The Metropolitan Council had alerted the city to this issue, necessitating an immediate fix to prevent excessive lake water from entering the wastewater system. The council is coordinating with their insurance provider to ensure compliance and address the concerns of the affected property owner.

Legislative updates included discussions on a housing bill and the ongoing pursuit of funding for local water treatment projects. The council is exploring alternative funding through the Public Facilities Authority and congressional directed spending, with an eye on potential grants.

The meeting also touched on administrative items, such as the extension of a recycling contract with Waste Management and the introduction of a code of conduct for council members.