2:53:52The meeting kicked off with an in-depth review of the ambitious project to convert the Saunders Hardware building. The proposal involves maintaining the ground floor for a 45-seat restaurant and adding two stories to accommodate six apartments. The architect presented plans, emphasizing the preservation of the building’s historical facade while incorporating modern functionality. The design includes two additional floors set back to maintain the original facade’s visibility, while rooftop equipment would be concealed to preserve the aesthetic integrity. The project aims to align with the town’s vision by integrating historical preservation with modern needs, a balance emphasized throughout the discussion.

3:56:13A critical point of contention was the parking strategy for the new development. The applicant proposed utilizing parking spaces at the nearby Keller Williams building during nights and weekends to mitigate the potential parking strain. Board members and residents expressed concerns about increased parking demand, particularly given the building’s proximity to public transit. The applicant assured the board that the proposal accounted for the additional parking needs, highlighting a plan for shared parking that leverages existing underutilized spaces. This cooperative approach involved using public parking lots during the day and private spaces overnight, addressing the challenges of accommodating resident and restaurant patron parking.

2:53:52The topic of density sparked debate, with discussions revolving around the necessity for a density variance to add the proposed residential units. The applicant argued that the inclusion of an affordable housing unit justified the increased density, aligning with Montclair’s master plan, which encourages diverse housing types near transit hubs. The board considered the implications of the density variance request, acknowledging the project’s potential to enhance community diversity and support lower-income residents. This focus on density and housing diversity was underscored by the board’s acknowledgment of the project’s unique position within Montclair’s landscape, both geographically and contextually.

42:46The meeting also addressed technical aspects of the project, such as drainage and structural integrity. Concerns about stormwater management led to discussions about implementing sustainable drainage solutions, including sump pumps and French drains. The board emphasized the importance of ensuring that mechanical systems and rooftop units comply with noise regulations to minimize disruption to the neighborhood. Additionally, the preservation of the building’s historical features was a priority, with plans to retain and restore the original brickwork and architectural elements.

2:53:52A significant portion of the meeting was dedicated to the affordable housing component of the project. The inclusion of one affordable unit among the six proposed was seen as a positive step towards addressing the town’s housing needs. Board members highlighted the importance of spreading affordable housing throughout Montclair, noting that this proposal contributes to that goal while also adhering to state mandates. The project’s historical preservation and proximity to public transit were key factors in justifying the density variance.

1:05:14These conditions included the provision of parking permits for residents, adherence to architectural plans, and compliance with lighting and utility ordinances.