0:21The most pressing discussion revolved around the lighting design at Park Street Congregation Chamen. Concerns were voiced about the brightness and placement of new wall sconces and pole lights proposed for the area. The discussion zeroed in on the proposed 5,000K color temperature, which was deemed too bright for a residential neighborhood. Suggestions were made to lower it to 3,500K to reduce harshness. The commission also addressed the placement of the fixtures, expressing concerns about light spill onto neighboring properties. Recommendations included re-aiming the lights inward and downward to limit light pollution and ensure adequate parking lot illumination.

19:40In a related discussion, the commission examined the lighting’s design, emphasizing the need for fixtures that complement the historical character of the building. There was a clear emphasis on security and aesthetics, with a preference for warmer lighting tones. The conversation underscored the importance of mounting wall sconces within mortar joints and concealing conduit to maintain the building’s aesthetic integrity.

A substantial portion of the meeting involved the planning board referral concerning 225 Lorraine Avenue, where plans for a third-floor addition were presented. The applicant’s representative provided a detailed account of the building’s history and the evolution of the project, which included the addition of a one-bedroom unit and office space. This proposal marked a shift from earlier designs. The design included a set-back third story, tandem parking spaces, and modern amenities like a private washroom and den.

The commission reviewed detailed elevations and materials, with an emphasis on harmonizing the new design with existing structures. The project aimed to preserve the historical character while offering necessary modern amenities. However, some members expressed concerns about the building’s height and potential shadowing on neighboring properties, notably the nearby business Veggie Heaven. The building’s proposed height of 39.5 feet, including HVAC screens, sparked debate about its visual impact and compatibility with adjacent structures.

38:20Further scrutiny arose over the proposed materials, particularly the use of stucco for the third floor. While aiming for a light and airy feel, some commissioners suggested more brickwork for better continuity with the lower floors. The inclusion of an EV charging station and a plant schedule for landscaping was part of the proposal.

1:14:16The meeting also examined the renovation plans for a historic house on Chestnut Street, which involved demolishing a non-historic garage. The homeowners presented their renovation intentions. The proposed addition would extend outward rather than upward, aligning with the home’s existing aesthetic. The commission discussed materials, the positioning of skylights, and the garage’s design, with an emphasis on maintaining historical coherence.

The conversation extended to the project’s impact on impervious coverage and compliance with local zoning regulations. The commission explored potential solutions for improving natural light within the renovated spaces, expressing a desire to balance modern family needs with historical preservation.

0:21The meeting concluded with a brief discussion on affordable housing legislation and its implications for historic preservation in Montclair. The commission recognized the importance of engaging in these discussions and formulating a clear stance to present to the council and mayor. The timeline for state housing deadlines was considered, with an emphasis on the need for continued dialogue and strategic planning.