Monticello School Board Accepts $25,000 in Donations, Addresses Student Testing Concerns

The Monticello School Board meeting on October 21, 2024, was marked by the acceptance of community donations totaling $25,000, discussions on student testing and performance metrics, and a touching tribute to a recently deceased student. The board also addressed policy updates and celebrated increased racial diversity within the district’s staff.

0:00A notable highlight of the meeting was the board’s acceptance of generous donations to the district, amounting to $25,000. Superintendent Eric Olson detailed the origins of these contributions, which included $5,000 from an anonymous donor to aid students in need at Monticello Middle School, $10,000 from Park View Care Center to support a Certified Nursing Assistant (CNA) instructor at Monticello High School, and additional funds from the Monticello Alliance Club and the VFW designated for research and leisure reading materials at the high school. These donations were framed as vital community efforts to enhance literacy and meet student needs, receiving unanimous approval from the board, which expressed gratitude for the community’s ongoing support.

23:23In addition to celebrating community contributions, the board engaged in a discussion regarding student testing and performance metrics, particularly concerning the “World’s Best Workforce” goals. The board examined student readiness and achievement data, noting specific areas of progress as well as challenges. A key point of focus was the kindergarten readiness metric, where 93.7% of four-year-olds were deemed ready for kindergarten, surpassing the board’s goal of 90%. However, the board also acknowledged declines in third-grade reading levels, as measured by both FastBridge and Minnesota Comprehensive Assessments (MCA) tests, attributing these setbacks to the lasting effects of the COVID-19 pandemic on early education.

38:34The board discussed the impact of reduced participation rates in testing and the cultural perceptions surrounding such assessments. There was a consensus on the need to foster a more supportive testing environment to alleviate student anxiety. Anecdotal evidence shared during the meeting highlighted a parent’s concern about their child’s stress related to the MCA tests.

23:23Further discussions revolved around the district’s goals to address racial and economic achievement gaps, with specific attention given to participation rates and the necessity of accurate data for assessing progress. The board noted a slight increase in performance for low-income students, while students of color experienced a minor decline. These metrics led to conversations about legislative proposals aimed at recalibrating participation rate calculations and a commitment to ongoing strategies for equitable educational access.

0:00Another crucial aspect of the board meeting was a somber acknowledgment by Superintendent Olson of the passing of Amber Sinot, an 11th-grade student who died from a medical emergency. The board observed a moment of silence in her memory, reflecting on the emotional impact of such a loss on the school community.

53:50The board also approved several grant applications aimed at supporting student activities and safety measures. These included applications for funds from the Minnesota State High School League Foundation to offset activity fees for students in sports and acquire an Automated External Defibrillator (AED) for the middle school tennis courts, alongside first aid training for coaches. Furthermore, the board sanctioned a student council trip to Craig’s Resort in Brainerd, emphasizing its role in leadership development.

1:09:47In the realm of policy and administration, updates to the Educational Support Services Master Agreement were approved, featuring revisions in dismissal language and sick leave allocations. The board also conducted a second reading of thirteen policy updates, covering areas such as student discipline, equal education opportunities, and school board member ethics. These updates were passed unanimously.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

is discussed during:
in these locations: