The superintendent outlined four key goal areas: school district finances, communication and community relationships, governance team effectiveness, and teaching and learning. Emphasizing the urgency of addressing school district finances, he highlighted the need for community engagement and support for the operating levy on the ballot for November 4th. The levy, if passed, would provide much-needed revenue starting in fiscal year 2026-2027, helping to prevent a potential $2 million budget cut. This funding is crucial, as the district’s enrollment has remained static since 2003, and the failure of state funding to keep up with inflation has put financial strain on the district.

The superintendent shared plans to engage the community through over 60 events and 2,500 phone calls, in addition to utilizing various communication platforms such as podcasts, video messages, and social media. This comprehensive approach is intended to inform voters about the levy and its importance to the district’s financial health. A potential tax increase for residents was discussed, with an emphasis on consulting tax specialists for possible refunds on increases. The board expressed that, even with the proposed increase, Monticello would not stand out among neighboring districts in terms of operating referendums.

The meeting also addressed the district’s broader strategic plan, developed seven years ago with community input, which serves as a framework for continuous improvement and engagement. The superintendent underscored the importance of collective efficacy among board members, describing the current strategic discussions as unprecedented in his career. This plan focuses on enhancing teaching and learning, fostering positive community relationships, and ensuring effective governance.

Educational initiatives were a focus. The district is also making efforts to streamline its online program, allowing students to balance work and schooling from home, and considering hybrid classes tailored by Monticello High School teachers.

The board discussed the implementation of a no-phone policy, which has met with mixed reactions. Some students reported improved focus in the classroom. Communication skills and the reliance on phones for social interaction were also debated, with a focus on encouraging students to engage more directly with their peers.

Discussions highlighted the need for timely data analysis to address student performance gaps and ensure that instructional practices are aligned with district goals. The board recognized the necessity of maintaining open communication channels and involving all stakeholders in these discussions to facilitate strategic adjustments based on data findings.

A presentation by the director of business services detailed the preliminary tax levy, which was reported to be decreasing by 2%, amounting to a reduction of $328,000. This decrease is largely attributed to declining student enrollment, which directly affects revenue streams, including the voter-approved referendum. The board approved the property tax levy at its maximum.

The meeting concluded with a second reading of several district policies, reflecting statutory updates and legislative changes. These policies covered a range of topics, from maintaining a drug-free workplace and school, to administration of medication, student transportation safety, and the organization of the school calendar. Each policy was discussed in detail, with the board emphasizing their importance in ensuring a safe and effective educational environment.