One of a notable topics discussed was the borough’s approach to tree management, particularly the challenges posed by storm damage and the necessity of maintaining an adequate tree canopy. Concerns were raised about the borough’s tree planting efforts, with a proposed budget of $8,000 intended to plant approximately 20 trees. However, it was pointed out that the previous year’s efforts resulted in only 11 new trees, prompting a suggestion to increase the budget to $11,000 to aim for planting 20 to 30 trees. Members discussed the need to identify potential planting spots without prematurely approaching homeowners, mindful of the high refusal rate for new trees.

The council also addressed discrepancies in tree removal and planting numbers, with some members emphasizing the importance of tracking these figures accurately. A proposal was made for conducting a planting survey to identify areas for new trees, although concerns were expressed about the practicality of this initiative given the high percentage of refusals by homeowners. Despite these challenges, there was a shared desire to enhance the borough’s tree canopy and ensure that tree management decisions are well-informed by data and community engagement.

Budget discussions highlighted the borough’s financial challenges, with concerns raised about the rapid growth in the budget over the past decade, which had increased by 18%. A suggestion was made to adopt a more systematic approach to budgeting, emphasizing regular risk assessments and proactive planning. Members acknowledged the importance of preparing the budget earlier in the fall based on actual needs and risk assessments, rather than relying on a singular annual evaluation.

The council also delved into the topic of accreditation requirements related to community forestry. These requirements include the need for a current Community Forest Management Plan, a tree inventory by 2025, core training for municipal employees and volunteers, and the submission of an annual accomplishment report. Achieving accreditation would open up additional grant opportunities and provide legal immunity from liability related to community forestry decisions. However, the process was noted to be a significant undertaking, requiring considerable planning and coordination.

Members discussed the need for enhanced record-keeping practices, including attaching photos to memos regarding tree assessments, to aid in decision-making and improve accountability. Acknowledging the reliance on a single individual for tree management decisions, there was a call for collective education on tree assessments and the potential integration of software solutions to streamline the documentation process.

The council’s efforts to address community needs were further highlighted by discussions around emergency tree situations, such as trees blocking roads. It was established that in emergencies, a memo would be generated alongside a photo to document the situation, and the borough’s forester would assess the situation to provide recommendations. Concerns about overburdening the Department of Public Works (DPW) were also discussed, with members expressing a desire to ensure that tasks related to tree maintenance are distributed effectively.

The meeting concluded with nominations for new leadership positions within the council, including a new chair for Arbor Day activities. The importance of collaboration and communication between the borough’s forester and the DPW was emphasized.