01:58The primary focus of the meeting was the public hearing on application PBO625 Low, concerning a minor subdivision on Eggbert Avenue. The applicant, represented by Simone Cali of Cali Law LLC, sought to divide the existing property into two separate parcels. The property, spanning approximately 0.98 acres, currently has two residential dwellings—with the main dwelling situated on the larger proposed lot 6.01 and a secondary dwelling on the smaller lot 6.02. The proposal required variances due to the existing structure’s position, which encroaches into the Conklin Avenue right-of-way.

21:58Project engineer Joshua Weary detailed the necessity for three variances: a lot depth variance with only 96.66 feet proposed against the required 100 feet, a front yard setback variance with a negative 20.3 feet proposed instead of the 35 feet minimum, and a side yard setback variance proposing 7.5 feet instead of the required 15 feet. The board expressed concerns about the shared sanitary sewer connection between the two dwellings and the need for separate services. They highlighted the importance of ensuring compliance with zoning laws, while acknowledging the historical context of the properties involved.

20:39During the discussion, there was considerable emphasis on the implications of granting these variances and the potential for future development. A board member raised concerns about possible future modifications to the existing structures and how such changes would necessitate compliance with current zoning standards. The board also clarified the licensing required for the dwelling that encroaches into the right-of-way, noting that any significant alterations would trigger a reevaluation under present zoning requirements.

33:04In addition to the subdivision application, the board explored the redevelopment potential of a nearby area for affordable housing, which was identified as a non-condemnation area in need of redevelopment. This area, comprising portions of two tax lots owned by Morris County, faces access challenges due to its location and lack of direct street frontage. The board’s investigation was in line with the township’s master plan and zoning regulations, focusing on providing affordable housing solutions.

52:41Consultant planner Mr. Phillips presented his findings, highlighting the area’s suitability for affordable housing due to its proximity to existing developments and its alignment with the township’s third-round housing plan. The board discussed the significance of the redevelopment area investigation determination, which would enable the developer to access financial incentives necessary for the feasibility of affordable housing projects.

59:09The board’s deliberations also touched upon the technicalities of access arrangements and the necessity of an easement through an adjoining property. This arrangement would ensure continued access to both the catch road field and the new development. The board clarified the ownership of the land, which is currently county-owned, and discussed the potential donation of the property to the municipality with a reverter clause ensuring its use for affordable housing.

01:06:38The meeting concluded with a motion to recommend the area for redevelopment, emphasizing the C criteria necessary for such a designation. The motion received support, and the board proceeded to vote in favor of the recommendation. With no public comments forthcoming, the board moved into a closed session to discuss related legal matters.