John James presented the conceptual plan for the Carriage Houses, intended to offer a downsizing-friendly living environment that aligns with the neighborhood’s historical architectural style. The plan features two house models: “The Spring Brook” and “The Lewis Morris,” both emphasizing open floor plans, sustainability, and customization options. Notably, the houses are designed to accommodate energy-star certification, all-electric utilities, and pre-wiring for solar panels.

During the meeting, board members and the public scrutinized the project’s design, questioning the orientation of front-facing garages in relation to the newly adopted design guidelines which discourage such designs. James defended his choice. The board remained concerned about the density of the proposed neighborhood and its scale compared to the surrounding area.

Further discussions addressed the project’s infrastructure, focusing on the roadways within the development, including the design of the turnaround area for emergency vehicles. The fire chief previously approved the turnaround’s design, but council members sought additional clarification. The width of the roads and their compliance with standards for low-density residential areas were also debated.

Questions arose about the environmental impact of the proposed development, particularly the effect on the local wildlife and tree preservation. Council member Goldberg raised concerns about the adequacy of the environmental impact statement, prompting discussions on the project’s compliance with environmental regulations. The council agreed to provide more detailed reports from experts, with further testing needed to verify soil infiltration rates and groundwater levels.

The Carriage Houses are designed not as starter homes but for those seeking convenience and a particular design aesthetic, with customizable options including elevators and basement spaces. The homes are approximately 3636 square feet, excluding the garage and porch, and the development is planned without age restrictions.

Residents voiced concerns about the distance between homes, to which James responded by clarifying the average separation distance and discussing the plans for maintaining privacy through varied spacing and tree screening. The term “Carriage House” was also defended by James as fitting for the downsized homes, in response to public concern over the term’s use.

The council also discussed practical issues such as snow removal and landscaping, the handling of mail delivery, and the potential implementation of underground heating elements for snow melting. The responsibility for exterior maintenance and the functionality of the proposed snow and leaf storage areas were clarified, with the homeowners association handling refuse collection and snow and leaf removal.

A notable moment in the meeting was when council member Gold addressed concerns about a property’s proximity to a firehouse, emphasizing faith in the fire department’s capabilities. This highlighted the ongoing discussions about safety and accessibility in case of emergencies.

The meeting concluded with the scheduling of a special meeting on February 12 to continue the discussion on the project, with a request for an extension through March for further review and consideration of the development. The council members also agreed to consider a request for a letter of support for an environmental inventory grant for the Environmental Commission.