The Board of Adjustment’s special meeting on February 12, 2024, marked a notable moment as Slocc Acquisitions LLC presented revised plans for the proposed development. The adjustments, a response to community feedback, included a reduction of homes from 16 to 14, the elimination of a previously planned pocket park, and the reallocation of two lots for up to four affordable townhomes. Other changes encompassed relocating the turnaround, increasing the space between buildings, adjusting garage placements, introducing dedicated visitor parking spaces, and adding internal sidewalks. The proposal also outlined neighborhood signage and beautification efforts.

Notably, board members voiced initial support for the revised plans. One member specifically favored the 20-foot roadways and preferred a cul-de-sac to the turnaround. The discussions also covered deed restrictions for affordable housing and the possible need for variances. Folo addressed the potential of revisiting the project in 2025 if current support proved insufficient, highlighting the township’s analysis of developable land and affordable housing obligations.

The Town Council’s debate mirrored concerns over the project’s density and its potential to set a precedent for future developments. Adjustments made by the developer, including a reduction in the number of homes and enhancements to landscaping, mail delivery, and signage, were noted with appreciation.

A focal point of the Town Council’s meeting was the topic of neighborhood representation and property maintenance. The council considered the importance of collaborating with residents, particularly about the placement and long-term maintenance of a neighborhood marker for the Springbrook area. The density of the proposed project also sparked debate, with suggestions ranging from reducing the number of units to exploring smaller home designs.

The subject of deed restrictions for affordable housing units generated discussion on the implications for future construction of affordable units. The council pondered the impact on open spaces and the necessity for contributions to the affordable housing trust fund. Additionally, the potential merging of lots to accommodate affordable units was discussed, alongside concerns about green space preservation and stormwater management.

Amid these considerations, the council expressed a commitment to further dialogue and potential project revisions. There was a consensus on the need for a transparent and inclusive process, recognizing the adversarial nature of the discussions to date. The council acknowledged the importance of neighborly engagement to reach a mutually agreeable solution and agreed to extend the project’s timeline to allow for additional considerations and revisions.

The public was encouraged to participate in the process by engaging with the developer to express concerns and contribute to the conversation. The council underscored the significance of ongoing communication and transparency. The discussions concluded with an understanding that the application would be put on hold for a review and potential revisions before being reconsidered by the council.