04:18The most notable application discussed during the meeting was for a second-story addition to the Kungquist residence. The couple, long-term residents of the property since 1994, explained their need for additional space as their children returned home. Their architect, who holds a degree from NJIT and is licensed in New Jersey, provided detailed testimony. His presentation focused on maintaining the colonial aesthetic of the original structure, built in 1955, while accommodating the family’s growing needs. The proposed design included a new primary suite and two additional bedrooms on the second floor, as well as a relocated laundry room from the basement to the second floor, reflecting modern home layout preferences.

07:21The architect emphasized that the addition would not alter the first-floor layout significantly, aside from adding a staircase to the new second floor. The expansion would also retain the home’s visual appeal. Maintaining harmony with the surrounding architecture was a key consideration, as the goal was to contribute positively to the neighborhood’s character. This point was reiterated by the architect, who assured the board that the addition would enhance the property’s value both for the current residents and potential future occupants.

15:27The discussion of the sideyard setback was central to the board’s evaluation. The existing setback was 15.1 feet, while the zoning requirement for a two-story structure necessitates a 20-foot setback. The architect explained that the corner lot’s unusual configuration required this variance, as the structure needed to be positioned toward the sideyard opposite the secondary front yard. Despite this, the design was crafted to ensure adequate light, air, and open space, with narrow windows on the side facing adjacent properties to respect neighbors’ privacy.

21:11Board members inquired about potential issues, such as the installation of floodlights on the upper level that might affect neighboring properties. The architect assured the board that the design would not include such features, maintaining the proposal’s compliance with neighborhood standards. Throughout the presentation, the architect reiterated that the addition would not increase the building’s footprint but rather expand vertically, making efficient use of the larger-than-required lot size.

22:19The public portion of the meeting revealed no comments or objections from residents, reflecting community support or neutrality towards the project. The board voted unanimously in favor of the application, commending the architect for the comprehensive presentation and attention to detail. The approval was contingent on preparing a resolution for the next meeting to formalize the decision.

00:56Earlier in the meeting, routine matters were addressed, including the approval of resolution BA-08-25 concerning SLOC Acquisitions LLC. This resolution confirmed compliance with previously granted preliminary major subdivision approval for a property on Spring Brook Road. The board unanimously approved this resolution.

02:19Additionally, the meeting briefly touched on the Euing application, BA-17-23. The board discussed rescheduling the hearing for July 28, 2025, with the possibility of seeking an extension from Mr. Brady to allow for an August 25 hearing. Without an extension, the board noted that the application might be dismissed without prejudice, allowing for reinstatement at the applicant’s request.