0:02The meeting began with the approval of a lakeshore setback variance for a property on Wilshire Boulevard. The applicant requested a 1-foot variance to replace a structurally compromised deck, which required adjustment due to a sewer line running beneath the proposed location. The commission reviewed the proposal, which included maintaining a hard cover within permissible limits, and discussed the minimal nature of the variance request. The applicant, represented by Mrs. Aurman, shared their efforts to comply with previous variances while addressing unexpected issues with the sewer line. After consideration of the staff’s supportive recommendation, the commission approved the variance with specific conditions and findings of fact.

14:49The commission then deliberated on a lot size variance for a proposed single-family home on Meadow Lane. The applicant’s design met various zoning requirements, but the lot size fell short of the district’s minimum. The commission noted the historical development patterns contributing to smaller lots and acknowledged that the applicant adhered to setback and hard cover requirements. With no public opposition and staff approval, the commission passed the variance request, allowing the construction of the proposed home.

Another variance discussion involved a front setback for an entryway addition to a replacement home on Tuxedo Boulevard. The existing home’s reconstruction, prompted by fire damage, necessitated a variance due to the lot’s irregular shape. The commission considered the challenges posed by the lot’s configuration and the importance of an entryway for the local climate. The applicant, Greg Jess, representing the owner, Mike Sadi, received support from the commission, which approved the variance, emphasizing the architectural enhancement’s benefit to the neighborhood.

29:55Beyond variance approvals, the meeting delved into broader zoning ordinance considerations. The commission acknowledged the necessity of reviewing front yard parking and exterior storage regulations, with suggestions to extend these regulations to side yards. Discussions also touched on side yard setbacks on major roads, with plans to incorporate these considerations into future ordinance evaluations.

The commission’s attention then shifted to long-term planning, including preparations for the Imagine 2050 comprehensive plan. The planning process, mandated by the Metropolitan Council, requires updates every ten years, with the next deadline in 2028. The commission discussed the extensive nature of this process, which involves demographic reviews and coordination with neighboring jurisdictions. Clarifications were provided about the timeline, emphasizing the forward-looking nature of comprehensive plans projecting 20 years into the future.

14:49The meeting concluded with a review of the 2025 Planning Commission work plan, which included updates on various zoning ordinance changes related to cannabis, solar energy, electric vehicle chargers, and accessory dwelling units. The construction season was noted as busy, with road restrictions aligning with state regulations and ongoing work in permitting for various projects.