The most notable matter discussed was Planning Case 25-11, concerning a lakeshore variance for the property on Bartlett Boulevard. The Fassenson family sought to replace an existing non-compliant pervious paver patio with a new, non-roofed at-grade deck. Sarah Smith, the planner, clarified that the proposed deck, designed with quarter-inch openings, would not be counted as hardcover, thus aligning with the city’s regulations. The property, previously approved for an expansion permit in 2017, currently exceeded the allowable hardcover percentage, and the new deck installation aimed to reduce it below the mandated 40%.

The commission considered feedback from the Department of Natural Resources (DNR), which recommended a shoreline buffer to mitigate wave action and enhance stormwater management. The property owners were amenable to this addition. The proposal received no objections from neighboring property owners and was supported by Hennepin County. After a discussion about the variance’s merits, including the transition from a non-pervious to a pervious surface, the commission moved to approve the variance unanimously. This decision will be forwarded to the City Council for inclusion on the agenda, pending any requests for additional discussion.

In contrast, the expansion permit request for a property on Cambridge Lane presented more issues. The property, featuring a historic house built in 1914, does not conform to existing setback requirements. The proposed new construction aims to reduce the nonconforming hardcover percentage from 64.69% to 48.31%, despite still exceeding the 40% limit. The applicant, represented by Erica Way, described the planned modifications, including a slightly smaller patio reconstruction and permeable paver driveway to address impermeable surfaces.

However, the discussion quickly turned to the challenges posed by the narrow access road, approximately 10 feet wide, affecting both the Kenny property and neighboring residents. Trent Sims, a resident of an adjacent property, voiced concerns over access issues, particularly for larger vehicles, due to the proximity of the proposed garage to the road. The situation is further complicated by the absence of recorded easements, leading to potential disputes over property lines and access rights.

The commission explored potential solutions, including expanding Cambridge Road or moving the driveway, but logistical constraints due to existing utilities posed significant challenges. Tim Kenny, the property owner, expressed a willingness to work with neighbors to mitigate access issues, emphasizing a commitment to maintaining good relationships. Despite these assurances, the commission remained cautious, recognizing the potential for future complications if access rights are not adequately addressed.

The commission also deliberated on the broader implications of approving the expansion permit, considering the potential precedent it might set for similar cases. While the applicants were following current requirements, the commission acknowledged the need for careful consideration of long-term access issues and their impact on neighboring properties.

In addition to the variance and expansion discussions, the commission touched on other matters, including updates on city policies and the 2025 work plan project, which focused on exterior storage regulations. The commission considered feedback on the number of allowable storage units and front yard parking, balancing aesthetic concerns with practical needs. Concerns about the city’s enforcement capabilities were raised, highlighting the need for dedicated resources to manage compliance effectively.

The meeting concluded with announcements about upcoming community events, including a tree lighting ceremony and a Thanksgiving meal. The next meeting, scheduled for December 2, will feature a public hearing on Halstead Point applications, with an invitation extended to the watershed authority for future discussions.