Goldman detailed the findings, which involved a six-month evaluation of buildings, resulting in a detailed report that categorized work into areas such as site improvements, interiors, and fire sprinklers. With emphasis on security, the audit identified urgent needs for renovating entrances and exits, upgrading gymnasiums, and addressing aging mechanical systems approaching the end of their useful life. Goldman assured that the report would remain secure, with board members given individual logins. She noted that Beachwood School faced slightly more issues than Deerfield, attributed to previous improvements at Deerfield during past referendums.

The board discussed the necessity of prioritizing projects, with some members expressing concern over the timeline for addressing critical needs. A call for an ad hoc committee to focus specifically on facilities issues emerged, recognizing that traditional meeting agendas often preclude in-depth discussions. The supervisor of maintenance underscored the importance of security, describing the state of some exterior doors and windows as unacceptable, lacking alarms, and the need for lighting upgrades, particularly at Beachwood. The conversation emphasized a structured approach to refine the list of needs.

Another topic was the financial implications of a potential agreement with Berkeley Heights, expiring in June 2027. Board members engaged in a heated discussion about the district’s financial responsibilities, particularly concerning a referendum scheduled for March 2026. The send-receive contract with Berkeley Heights mandates that any proposed referendums and related debt be presented to the Mountainside Board for feedback, although Mountainside residents will not be able to vote on it.

The upcoming referendum’s proposed projects include significant capital improvements at Governor Livingston High School, such as site parking upgrades, security enhancements, and media center renovations. The referendum outlines two questions: the first, totaling $7.5 million with $2.5 million in debt service aid, and the second, for $10.4 million with $3.5 million in aid. The net cost for Mountainside residents would be $5 million and $6.9 million, respectively. The average tax impact for Mountainside residents was estimated at $11.37 annually for the first question and approximately $26 to $27 for the second.

Concerns arose about the financial burden on Mountainside taxpayers, with questions on whether the referendum costs would come from the school board’s budget or be reflected in tax assessments. The board debated the fairness and impact on taxpayers, especially considering the diverse needs of the community. There was a consensus on the need for transparency and clarity regarding financial responsibilities, urging residents to review tax paperwork to understand individual obligations.

Additionally, the board addressed recent developments in the athletic department, including the delivery of a new press box and the introduction of a girls’ flag football club. Concerns were voiced about online safety following an incident involving a QR code at a BMX tour event. The meeting also covered committee structures, residency restrictions, and the search for a Supervisor of Special Services, with interviews and stakeholder meetings planned.