A primary point of discussion was Amendment A, which seeks to rename the town administrator to “town manager” to enhance recruitment potential and align the role’s responsibilities with state standards. This proposed change is part of a broader effort to modernize Natick’s governance framework. The committee recognized this amendment as important for attracting qualified candidates to the role by reflecting its expanded scope and aligning with prevailing norms across Massachusetts.

Further significant was Amendment B, which proposed a procedural change in filling vacancies among elected representatives. Historically managed solely by the town clerk, this responsibility has transitioned to involve both the elected moderator and the clerk. This change, prompted by the conversion of the town clerk’s position from an elected to an appointed role, emphasizes collaboration and aims to uphold the integrity of the electoral process.

The committee also examined Amendment E, which addressed attendance requirements for town agency representatives during meetings. The initial provision mandated the attendance of representatives from all divisions, deemed excessive. The amendment recommends granting the moderator discretion in determining necessary attendance based on agenda relevance, thus promoting efficient meeting management.

Additionally, the committee focused on Amendment F, which anticipates potential changes in state law regarding ranked-choice voting.

Amendment G introduced a coordination provision to address pressures on moderators about committee appointments. It clarified that while select board members might call upon various officials during meetings, this should occur only when genuine business is at hand, thereby maintaining the meeting process’s integrity.

In addition to these amendments, the committee deliberated on motions affecting the upcoming ballot. Motion two proposed creating a deputy moderator position, addressing a gap left by the transition of the town clerk’s role. The committee also addressed language inclusivity, with Motion Four aiming to remove gender-specific terms like “he” and “his” from the charter, reflecting gender diversity among town administrator appointees.

Financial matters were also on the agenda, with discussions about outstanding invoices and budget allocations. One particular invoice from Mrs. Duris, amounting to $3,437.70, was approved for payment. The committee confirmed returning $50,000 of an additional $75,000 received from the finance committee to the town’s free cash account. This financial management was part of the committee’s broader efforts to ensure fiscal responsibility and transparency.

The committee also considered the accessibility of its work to the public, particularly through maintaining its webpage active even after disbandment. The communications director assured that the committee’s materials would remain available for public reference, crucial for informing voters ahead of elections and ensuring transparency.

Reflecting on their work, committee members expressed appreciation for the collective effort in reviewing and proposing changes to the charter and bylaws. They acknowledged the diverse expertise within the committee and the progress made during their tenure.