The most substantive discourse centered on the proposed tree protection bylaw, intended to preserve Natick’s tree canopy. The commission discussed a grant application submitted to the Metropolitan Area Planning Council (MAPC) to assist in drafting the bylaw’s language. A core element of the bylaw would be using canopy cover as a metric for tree preservation, a point that spurred questions about the need for baseline measurements of the existing tree canopy. Concerns were raised about the potential decline in canopy coverage, emphasizing the necessity of robust data to bolster the bylaw’s case. A suggestion emerged that aerial imagery tools could offer rough estimates of the current canopy cover, though the feasibility of obtaining such data was debated.

The methodology of measuring tree diameter at breast height (DBH) and the implications of various exemptions for tree removal were also scrutinized. Some members advocated for a simplified approach to the bylaw to avoid complexity that could hinder its acceptance, drawing on experiences from other municipalities where intricate regulations met resistance. The idea of forming a tree committee surfaced as a strategic move to facilitate the bylaw’s implementation and ensure public participation. However, questions loomed regarding the committee’s authority and the potential for public hearings on tree removal permits, which could lead to neighborly disputes.

The commission acknowledged that supporting regulations would be necessary to guide the committee’s operations. A balance between tree preservation and property rights was sought, with members urging clarity to ensure public comprehension and acceptance.

The dialogue extended to the potential establishment of a tree committee, which would play a role in both administrative and educational capacities. Such a committee could potentially streamline the permitting process for tree removal, alleviating the burden on property owners while maintaining oversight. The prospect of implementing a fee structure for tree removal, with funds directed towards replanting, was explored. Discussions revolved around the committee’s authority, particularly concerning enforcement and exemptions for invasive species.

There was recognition that the tree committee could proceed independently of the bylaw. The idea was to bolster public involvement in tree planting initiatives, addressing existing frustrations over limited participation.

The conversation also touched on the specifics of tree removal and replacement policies. Suggestions were made to prioritize replacing trees on the property where they were removed, with guidelines considering species diversity and planting a variety of species rather than one-for-one replacements. A proposal was put forth for homeowners to either present a replacement plan or pay a fee, with funds used for town-wide tree planting.

In addition, the meeting addressed tree work planned for the Town Forest, particularly around infrastructure such as the reservoir and water tower. Concerns about tree proximity to the water supply were raised, with plans to remove and prune trees to prevent potential breaches. Collaborative efforts between departments aimed to ensure ecological balance by introducing native plants following tree removals.