The Everett Street development dominated the meeting, with a debate about increasing the number of housing units from an initial figure of 11.17 to 16. The applicant defended this proposal by aligning it with prior Planning Board decisions and emphasizing the need for middle-income housing. Concerns were raised about the density increase, with board members and public participants questioning whether the motivation was financial rather than addressing housing needs.

Community members expressed concerns about the visual impact of the development, particularly from Everett Street, and stressed the importance of ensuring the project complements the neighborhood’s aesthetic. The revised layout presented at the meeting aimed to improve the street presence of the houses, featuring colonial-style designs with welcoming front porches and minimized asphalt surface areas. However, the number of units remained a contentious issue, with calls for clear justification grounded in zoning bylaws.

The meeting also addressed the potential environmental impact of the development, particularly regarding stormwater management and sidewalk expansion. The sidewalk expansion plan raised further concerns about the removal of trees on private property, which could affect the scenic designation of the road.

Additionally, the board considered substantial amendments to zoning regulations, proposing a new “neighborhood corridor” zoning district and changes to the limited commercial zoning district. These amendments aim to address the inconsistencies in the current zoning landscape, particularly along West Central Street. The proposed changes seek to introduce a form-based code that promotes good urban form and integrates open spaces while accommodating various transportation modes.

The potential for taller buildings in certain areas was another focal point, with debates about height restrictions and the use of bonus structures to allow flexibility. Community members had mixed reactions to these proposals, with some advocating for higher density near transit nodes to support mixed-use development and others expressing concern about the aesthetic impact on the neighborhood.

Public comments revealed a spectrum of opinions, with some residents supporting increased density and mixed-use developments, while others raised concerns about traffic, environmental impact, and the preservation of neighborhood character.