1:15:20The interchange project, initially presented as a bridge replacement, has expanded into a diverging diamond interchange, raising alarm among board members. They criticized the design as contextually insensitive and potentially altering the community’s landscape. The financial scope of the project was also highlighted, with comparisons to similar undertakings in nearby towns that were completed for less.

The board discussed drafting a letter to the Select Board to formally express their concerns about the bypassed MEPA review. Members emphasized the need for a thorough environmental review to evaluate alternatives and impacts, arguing that the project’s classification as a bridge replacement should not exempt it from such scrutiny. There was a call for transparency from MassDOT and for the Select Board to advocate for the community’s interests.

1:32:45The discussion also touched on the Planning Board’s role in addressing the project’s implications. Members debated whether it was appropriate for them to intervene, given the Select Board’s position as highway commissioners. Some members expressed frustration over the lack of information and coordination, stressing the need for a unified response to the Select Board. A suggestion was made to involve the Planning Board chair in drafting the letter.

0:09In addition to the interchange project, the meeting addressed a proposal for a home-based dog boarding operation on Highland Street. The applicants sought a special permit to expand their existing service from four to eight dogs, citing increased demand during peak times. They detailed their setup, including a fenced yard with an airlock system for safe entry, and emphasized their focus on providing a loving environment for the dogs.

18:06Board members raised questions about waste management, fencing, and neighbor notification. The applicants assured the board of proper waste disposal and detailed their fencing arrangements. They also confirmed sending notifications to neighboring residences, though turnout at the meeting was low. Support from neighbors, including letters and public comments, was highlighted, with some residents praising the applicants’ care and the absence of noise or traffic issues.

32:15The board deliberated on the need for a rough site plan and further documentation before proceeding. Concerns about light pollution from floodlights and wildlife encounters were discussed, with the applicants providing assurances about their practices. The board emphasized the importance of maintaining communication with the community and ensuring compliance with home occupation bylaws.

1:00:35The meeting also explored the potential for allowing commercial kitchens in residential zones under a special permit. Members debated the feasibility and implications of such a proposal, considering the costs and requirements of setting up a commercial kitchen. There was support for creating opportunities for small businesses, though concerns about deliveries and operational disruptions were noted.

Some board members advocated for clearer criteria within the special permit process to manage potential issues, such as noise and odors. The discussion included the possibility of involving the Finance Committee in broader community discussions on the topic. The board recognized the need for more public input and collaboration with the Board of Health to establish clear definitions and criteria for commercial kitchens.

1:32:45Other agenda items included planning committee assignments, the resignation of a community planner, and the need for a new designee for the Natick Affordable Housing Trust Fund. The meeting concluded with a reminder to review the upcoming warrant and prepare for future discussions.