35:42The board’s discussion on signage compliance was particularly detailed and involved a proposed daycare center on West Central Street. The applicant sought permission for signage that exceeded local zoning bylaws dimensions. The proposed signs included an elephant graphic named “Bubbles,” which raised questions about its impact on overall sign dimensions and readability. Concerns were expressed regarding the font’s size and color, with suggestions made to improve legibility by resizing elements.

The board scrutinized the square footage and number of signs, with a particular focus on whether decorative elements should be included in the overall signage area. This included a debate on whether the elephant graphic, estimated to occupy 20 square feet, should be counted toward the total permissible signage area of 80 square feet. The board members sought to balance the daycare’s branding needs with zoning compliance.

In a bid to streamline the process, a consensus was reached that removing the elephant from the building facade and retaining it on the monument sign could simplify compliance issues. This proposal aimed to keep the signage aesthetically pleasing while adhering to local regulations. Additionally, lighting concerns for the monument sign were discussed, including the potential blinding effect of a spotlight. The board advised that lighting intensity and placement should comply with local requirements, a matter ultimately overseen by the building commissioner.

01:25:03Beyond signage, the Planning Board tackled the appointment process for the affordable housing trust fund, a position unfilled for nearly two years. The board considered appointing a local resident who had expressed interest, debating whether to conduct a town-wide search or directly appoint the interested candidate. Advocates for immediate appointment highlighted the importance of fostering community involvement and recognized the candidate’s relevant real estate background. The board chair, newly in position, emphasized a fair and open process but agreed to reach out to the interested individual to ensure they felt valued and included in the deliberations.

01:05:12In addition to these discussions, the board reviewed amendments to a site plan based on feedback from the Conservation Commission and the Department of Public Works. Updates were made to address parking layout, circulation, and lighting concerns raised by neighbors. The revised plan included a modular retaining wall and guardrail to mitigate lighting impacts on adjacent properties. A neighbor’s request for a one-year review of lighting and stormwater management was incorporated into the plan approval.

01:32:21Finally, the meeting rounded off with a report on the community preservation committee’s recent agreement on a plan, with letters of interest for new projects set to open on May 1st. The board emphasized the need for readiness in project proposals due to the truncated timeline.