Jamie Faye of Gables Residential introduced the development team, which included specialists in landscape architecture, civil engineering, and legal counsel, who presented the updated plans. Acknowledging the public and town officials’ input, Faye highlighted that the project had evolved from its original conception. The updates included adjustments in the architectural design to harmonize with town aesthetics and respond to previous feedback on traffic and parking concerns.

Brian O’Connor from Cube Three Architects detailed the six core design changes. A focus was placed on the building’s exterior, especially the brickwork and pedestrian experience, which were modified to improve visual appeal and functionality. Enhancements in the non-residential entry area included refined window patterns and entry lighting, integrated into a cohesive frontage that delineates residential and non-residential spaces effectively.

The Planning Board engaged in evaluating these updates, particularly concerning the design review board’s recommendations. The board members sought further clarification on whether the design review board’s recommendations had been fully implemented in the current plans.

The development team also addressed community concerns regarding the interplay of residential and non-residential components. The ground floor, designated for non-residential use, was designed with larger windows to differentiate it from the residential units above. The project’s plaza was another focal point.

Ian Ramey of Copley Wolf Landscape Architects elaborated on landscaping plans, emphasizing the expansive plaza of approximately 14,000 to 15,000 square feet. This south-facing space was designed to be multifunctional, accommodating various activities and integrating fixed seating areas. Enhancements to the MBTA connector path included expanding its width and adding decorative elements to enrich the pedestrian experience and celebrate Natick’s identity.

The non-residential space’s potential programming was another topic of interest. Proposed uses included a co-working space and a grab-and-go market. The development team expressed a desire to activate the space with community events, potentially in collaboration with the Morris Institute Library. This approach aimed to foster community engagement and avoid the space becoming underutilized.

Traffic management and pedestrian safety were crucial aspects of the discussion. The board reviewed a truck turning study to ensure that delivery vehicles could navigate the site efficiently. Future traffic scenarios were analyzed, accounting for the potential reopening of the Boden Lane bridge, which could impact traffic flow dynamics.

Pedestrian pathways and crosswalks were highlighted as essential components of the development. The board examined the feasibility of implementing a multi-use pathway along West Central Street, considering existing obstacles and the absence of sidewalks on the north side. The need for signalized pedestrian crossings was emphasized to enhance safety and connectivity to surrounding areas.

The board also discussed parking arrangements, noting the introduction of a hang-tag system for visitors and the possibility of leasing excess parking spaces if available. The importance of decoupling parking from apartment rentals was underscored, with the intent of optimizing space utilization and accommodating community needs.