Residents voiced a strong desire for the project to align more closely with the single-family home character of the area. Concerns about traffic congestion and safety were prevalent, particularly with the increased vehicular activity anticipated on Everett Street, a road already experiencing speed issues. A resident highlighted the problematic nature of the current traffic conditions, noting the potential hazards for pedestrians and the strain on local emergency services, such as the small fire station nearby.

The Planning Board addressed the need for a traffic study to evaluate these concerns, acknowledging that the intersection at Cottage and Everett Streets requires a closer examination of crash data and traffic flow. Ensuring pedestrian safety and maintaining clear sightlines were emphasized as critical factors in reviewing the project’s impact. The board acknowledged the necessity of balancing development with community needs, emphasizing that future meetings would continue to address these issues.

Residents urged the Planning Board to consider direct contributions to affordable housing rather than funneling funds into a trust, emphasizing the immediate need for affordable units. The board noted the project’s proposal to raise the affordable housing unit contribution from two to three units by utilizing a density bonus, although this aspect also faced skepticism from the public.

The board members emphasized the importance of adhering to zoning bylaws, which allow for cluster housing development to preserve open space. They noted that the development requires only one waiver for density. However, residents expressed a desire for a more community-centered approach, highlighting the need for transparency and engagement throughout the planning process.

In addition to Everett Street’s development concerns, the meeting also addressed broader zoning issues in Natick. The Planning Board discussed potential zoning changes as part of the Natick 2030 initiative, focusing on the West Natick corridor. This area is envisioned as a pedestrian-friendly, mixed-use zone, with discussions about creating new zoning districts to accommodate varying densities and neighborhood contexts. The board explored the implications of these changes, emphasizing the importance of aligning development with community vision and regulatory requirements.

The proposed zoning changes include transitioning certain areas to limited commercial zones, restricting uses to restaurants, retail, and office space while excluding traffic-heavy operations like drive-throughs. The board expressed a commitment to refining zoning language to ensure clarity and alignment with community needs, particularly regarding the transition between commercial and residential zones.