This proposed policy does not designate Natick as a sanctuary city but aims to safeguard the privacy of all residents, irrespective of their immigration status. A significant aspect of the discussion focused on the potential risks and misunderstandings surrounding the policy, including concerns about community safety and federal funding implications.

Several residents voiced apprehension about the policy. One speaker questioned whether the policy would lead to a sanctuary status perception, potentially affecting crime rates and federal funding for local schools. Another resident expressed concerns about the lack of clarity regarding the policy’s implementation and how it would manage the influx of undocumented immigrants. These residents urged the board to provide more transparency and communication about the policy’s specifics and its potential impact on the community.

In response, the board clarified that the policy is not about providing housing or resources to undocumented individuals but rather about instructing town employees on legal compliance and respecting privacy. It was emphasized that the policy could be rescinded if necessary and that it was primarily designed to document current police practices rather than introduce new ones. The board also encouraged residents to reach out to state and federal legislators for broader immigration concerns, highlighting the policy’s local focus.

Supporters of the policy argued for its necessity in fostering a welcoming and inclusive environment for Natick’s diverse population. They stressed the importance of protecting residents from racial profiling and discrimination based on perceived immigration status. Proponents highlighted the town’s values of neighborliness and community and called for a focus on these principles rather than federal inaction on immigration issues.

The board member emphasized the policy’s intent to protect town employees from liabilities associated with inquiries about immigration status, which are prohibited under state law. The policy was presented as a measure to allow residents to access town services without disclosing their immigration status, thereby mitigating risks for both individuals and the town.

Following extensive public comments and board deliberations, the board moved to approve an amended version of the policy, which included stipulations that no town employee should inquire about or collect information on an individual’s citizenship status unless mandated by law. The policy also clarified that town employees are not authorized to act as immigration officers and does not hinder lawful duties executed under judicial warrants.

In addition to the immigration policy discussion, the meeting addressed a water and sewer abatement appeal from a resident who received an unusually high water bill. The board responded by investigating the issue and proposed an abatement based on the resident’s historical usage, which was well-received by the resident.

A public hearing was also held regarding Eversource Energy’s petition to install new infrastructure at a residential subdivision, which received board approval with specific conditions.

The board’s meeting concluded with a discussion on updates to the town’s alcohol policy, which included clarifying training requirements and the consumption of alcohol by contractors and performers. The board considered a balanced approach to training, combining in-person and online sessions, and decided to amend policy language to be more inclusive and flexible.