A particularly contentious discussion unfolded around the proposed development on High Street. The project aimed to replace an existing structure with a larger four-bedroom home, leading to concerns from residents about its potential impact on the neighborhood’s character. Glenn Glader, a resident from 28 Reynolds Avenue, voiced apprehensions by stating that the proposed design was out of character with the surrounding homes, which could transform the smallest house in the area into the largest. He suggested a smaller design might better align with the existing neighborhood aesthetics.

In defense of the proposal, John Zko, a personal representative of the estate associated with the existing house, argued that the new design was consistent with other nearby properties based on data from the Natick GIS assessor’s website, citing similar-sized homes in the vicinity. Despite these assurances, board members and residents continued to express concerns about the size and scale of the new structure, especially given the existing house’s original square footage of 919 square feet compared to the proposed nearly 3,000 square feet above ground.

The board also discussed the implications of increasing home sizes on property taxes and neighborhood standards, though the chairman noted that some concerns might not fall within their purview. The board emphasized the importance of maintaining the neighborhood’s character while deliberating on the proposal’s potential detriment compared to existing structures.

Moving on to other applications, the board reviewed an application for a property on Charles Street submitted by SNS Development, which involved replacing a single-family dwelling on a non-conforming lot. Jerry Goodman, a neighbor from 39 Charles Street, expressed support for the project while raising concerns about traffic management and stormwater issues, particularly during winter. The applicant’s representative responded by assuring that a stormwater management plan would be required before construction began. The board approved the application, contingent on the project conforming to the submitted plans and ensuring it would not be substantially more detrimental than the existing structure.

The meeting also addressed an application for a property on Sunshine Avenue, where the board approved a proposal to construct an addition on an existing non-conforming lot. The approval was granted under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40A, Section 6, alongside Natick zoning bylaws, with stipulations for substantial conformance to the submitted plans. A neighbor expressed support for the proposal, downplaying the significance of the riverfront wetlands near the property.

Another application considered was for a property on Pilgrim Road, where the board approved constructing an addition on a non-conforming lot. Discussions highlighted concerns about stormwater management and the proposed second-floor height. Assurances were made by the applicant about retaining a large tree on the property and considering permeable materials to address runoff concerns. The board approved the project with conditions to preserve neighborhood features and mitigate potential environmental impacts.