The meeting commenced with a proposal on Liberty Street, where Steven Kamli of Kamli Construction and Development, Inc. sought approval to demolish an existing single-family dwelling to make way for new construction. The project, situated on a non-conforming lot in an aquifer recharge district, prompted discussions about regulatory compliance. The board deliberated on the differences between aquifer recharge and protection, eventually determining that the project met stormwater management requirements. Concerns from residents included the absence of a proposed fence and the disparity in side yard dimensions. Despite these issues, the board approved the project with a four-to-one vote, contingent upon adherence to submitted plans and town department requirements.

Another discussion focused on Virginia Road, where the demolition of an existing dwelling was proposed to construct a new home. Concerns primarily centered around stormwater management and asbestos removal. A resident highlighted the risks associated with asbestos, prompting the board to emphasize the need for strict compliance with health regulations before demolition. The new structure’s design was scrutinized for its footprint and aesthetic appeal, leading to suggestions for additional windows to improve its facade. While the board approved the project, the conversation underscored the need for community consultation, as the applicant had not engaged with neighboring property owners.

The proposal for 6 Ambler Court also drew discussion. Residents expressed concerns about the environmental impact due to its proximity to wetlands. The applicant confirmed compliance with “no build” regulations, moving the new construction further from the wetlands. The board unanimously approved the project, acknowledging its alignment with town requirements and the positive environmental modifications.

The board’s agenda also included the project on Longfellow Road, where the demolition of an existing dwelling and new construction was proposed. Resident concerns focused on a large oak tree’s safety, with suggestions to involve an arborist for assessment. The tree’s potential danger during storms was a significant talking point. The board’s decision to approve the project was conditioned upon a professional evaluation of the tree.