Natick Zoning Board Meeting: Developer Compromise on Kendall Lane Eases Neighborhood Concerns
- Meeting Overview:
The Natick Zoning Board meeting addressed a series of applications involving non-conforming lots, notably reaching a critical compromise on the development on Kendall Lane, where privacy and neighborhood character were of significant concern. The developer agreed to adjust the rear setback to enhance privacy for neighbors, resolving a contentious issue that had drawn considerable attention.
45:33The most notable development of the evening was the discussion surrounding the proposed construction on Kendall Lane. Here, the board deliberated over privacy concerns raised by residents regarding a new two-family dwelling planned for the site. The developer initially intended to maintain a rear setback of 25 feet, with an additional patio extending into the backyard, leaving less than 10 feet of usable space. Mozzie Erti, speaking on behalf of the Erti Family Trust, emphasized that the proposed configuration did not align with the neighborhood’s character, which features more substantial setbacks. Erti advocated for moving the structure closer to Kendall Lane to ensure adequate front and backyard space, citing potential privacy violations due to “unavoidable sight lines.”
1:01:01The board examined the zoning regulations and confirmed that the patio’s extension did not affect compliance with zoning codes. However, they recognized the concerns about neighborhood character and privacy. In a spirit of compromise, a board member proposed that the developer adjust the rear setback to 35.8 feet by moving the structure forward by 10 feet. This compromise was well-received, and the developer agreed to the modification, which addressed the privacy concerns while allowing the project to proceed.
The board’s decision was contingent upon the project adhering to the revised plans, including the rear setback adjustment. Additionally, a letter from an abutter was acknowledged, which requested conditions to preserve certain trees and maintain an existing wooden stockade fence between properties. These conditions were incorporated into the board’s approval.
0:10Another notable topic addressed during the meeting involved a variance request for a construction project on Marshall Road. The project, presented by Seth Doby, sought a variance for a front entry and side yard setback to accommodate a farmer’s porch on an existing single-family dwelling. Doby recused himself from discussions due to a conflict of interest, as his daughter had babysat for the applicants. The board scrutinized the variances requested, emphasizing the need for precise language and understanding of zoning regulations to ensure compliance.
14:18Discussions highlighted the necessity of neighborly communication, an important aspect underscored by Speaker 7, who confirmed that the affected neighbor had been consulted and understood the plans, although they chose not to attend the meeting. The project was eventually approved, with the board finding that the side setback adjustment would not be “substantially detrimental to the neighborhood.”
29:36The meeting also focused on an application for a property on Cottage Street, where Miles Walker proposed raising an existing garage and constructing a new one on a preexisting non-conforming lot. The board reviewed the existing conditions and found that the lot generally complied with zoning regulations, except for a slight height increase in the new structure. The board prepared to approve the project, provided it conformed to the submitted plans and any requirements from town departments.
1:01:01Subsequent discussions involved a proposal for a property on Felch Road, where the applicant aimed to demolish and reconstruct a single-family dwelling. The board reviewed zoning compliance, particularly regarding lot size and setbacks, and opened the floor for public comments. Neighbors expressed both support and concerns, mainly related to the proximity of the new structure to property lines and potential impacts on landscaping. The board assured that the proposed construction would adhere to zoning laws, alleviating some concerns.
1:15:23The meeting also tackled procedural matters related to a garage installation at Scarsdale Road. The board navigated confusion regarding attendance and voting eligibility, ultimately encouraging the applicant to withdraw their request to strengthen their case for a future reapplication. The withdrawal was accepted unanimously, allowing the applicant to refine their submission without facing a two-year waiting period.
Zoning Board Officials:
-
Meeting Type:
Zoning Board
-
Committee:
-
Meeting Date:
01/27/2025
-
Recording Published:
-
Duration:
91 Minutes
-
Notability Score:
Routine
Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:
-
State:
Massachusetts
-
County:
Middlesex County
-
Towns:
Natick
Recent Meetings Nearby:
- 02/13/2025
- 02/14/2025
- 104 Minutes
- 02/13/2025
- 02/14/2025
- 55 Minutes
- 02/13/2025
- 02/13/2025
- 274 Minutes