The most contentious topic revolved around a proposal by David Pimental to establish a chicken coop at his property on David Street. Residents voiced significant opposition, citing the proximity of the proposed coop to their homes and potential disruptions to the neighborhood’s character. Concerned locals argued that the presence of chickens could lead to unsanitary conditions and attract pests, impacting property values. One resident, Donna from David Street, underscored the concern by stating that homes in her area were valued at approximately $450,000, attributing this to the neighborhood’s well-maintained character. She argued that allowing chickens would set a detrimental precedent, compromising the quality of life for nearby homeowners.

Another resident raised health concerns, pointing out the susceptibility of chickens to diseases that could potentially be transmitted to humans. Despite reassurances from Mr. Pimental about the health and care of his chickens, the fears remained unassuaged. The board ultimately suggested tabling the proposal, recommending that Mr. Pimental engage with his neighbors to seek a resolution before returning to the board.

A similar debate unfolded over Monica Fernandez’s request for a chicken coop variance at South Almond Street. Despite an inspector’s report indicating the property met all criteria for chicken keeping, neighbors expressed strong opposition. Concerns were raised about the coop’s proximity to neighboring properties, with residents worried about noise and odors. One neighbor, Michael Sardina, emphasized discomfort with the coop’s closeness to his inground pool, highlighting the potential for disruptive smells. In response to these concerns, the Fernandez family agreed to consider relocating the coop to a more suitable area on their property. The board decided to revisit the discussion the following month, allowing time for the Fernandez family to address the concerns raised.

The meeting also included a variance request by Anna Martins of High Street, which faced opposition due to concerns about rodent infestations and other unsanitary practices. A resident, Kelly, cited a history of rodent problems in the neighborhood, exacerbated by activities such as trash burning on the Martins’ property. Leland Daltry echoed these concerns, questioning the board’s process in issuing variances when property owners had already violated regulations by keeping livestock without permission. The board decided to table this request, seeking more information on the reported issues.

In contrast, the variance request by Jack and Nellia Santos of Hascoll Street proceeded with less controversy. The Santos’ application described a large, well-maintained property with a rodent-proof coop. With no opposition, the board moved forward with approving their request, allowing them to keep chickens without the presence of roosters.

In addition to the variance discussions, the board provided updates on administrative matters. The position for a youth services coordinator had been posted, with interviews scheduled. The board also planned to send a letter of appreciation to Christian McCloskey for over 20 years of service, acknowledging his contributions with a citation from the mayor.