The council’s most focus was on Ordinance 2025-10, which seeks to amend Chapter 257 of the borough code to regulate ebikes and scooters. The ordinance classifies ebikes into three categories, following state law: Class 1, Class 2, and Class 3, with Class 3 requiring licensing and registration. Key provisions include prohibiting Class 1 and Class 2 ebikes on sidewalks, banning mobile device use while riding, and implementing penalties for violations. The ordinance aims to enforce state laws and promote safe ebike use within the borough.

The chief of police explained that the ordinance is not intended to over-police but to educate residents about the responsibilities of ebike ownership, particularly for parents giving ebikes to children. The chief highlighted past incidents involving ebike crashes and noted that a video campaign is in development with the board of education to promote ebike safety. Neighboring towns, like Summit, are developing similar ordinances.

Public comments on the ordinance brought diverse perspectives. Steve Carellis, a resident from Berkeley Heights, raised concerns about enforcement for non-residents and questioned police engagement in educating them about local laws. He also queried the process for returning confiscated electronic devices used in violation of the ordinance. Brian Gardner, another resident, emphasized safety issues, such as the absence of lights or reflectors on bikes, recounting a recent incident involving his wife.

The proposed registration process for ebikes, outlined in Ordinance 2025-15, includes a $20 fee and requires owners to provide details about ownership, bike specifications, and battery types. The registration is not intended as a revenue stream but as a tool for accountability and awareness. Concerns were voiced about potential barriers to ebike adoption, particularly for adults transitioning from cars to bikes. Despite these concerns, the council emphasized that the primary goal of the ordinance is education.

Discussions on infrastructure and development were also prominent. Residents expressed concerns about high-density developments near Mountain Avenue and Ryder Way, emphasizing the importance of maintaining community character. A proposed cul-de-sac was a point of contention, with opinions divided on its potential impact on traffic management. Some residents supported the cul-de-sac as a means to alleviate traffic, while others feared it would convert public assets for private developer use.

Regarding the ebike ordinance, a participant suggested that the registration process could deter ebike use, particularly for adults seeking alternatives to car travel. The council acknowledged these concerns but reiterated that education and safety were the ordinance’s primary objectives. The registration does not impose annual fees like pet licenses, alleviating some financial concerns.

Concerns were also raised about the enforcement of registration, particularly for non-residents using ebikes in New Providence. The council emphasized the need for a community-focused approach, prioritizing education over punishment. The ordinance’s one-time registration process aims to inform owners about their legal responsibilities without imposing a financial burden.

In response to concerns about outdated registrations, the council clarified that there would be no renewal requirement. However, if an ebike is sold, the new owner must register it.

Infrastructure discussions included the demolition of the old Cool Bridge and the S Street Bridge project. The council also addressed resolutions for stormwater management and the emergency replacement of a variable frequency drive at the wastewater treatment plant.

The meeting concluded with acknowledgments of community events, such as Veterans Day ceremonies and plans for the annual holiday walk. The council also approved several agenda items.