Joe Lewis, presenting the hydrology study, emphasized the inadequacy of the city’s current drainage system. He noted that the system can handle only about 400 to 600 cubic feet per second (CFS), while a 100-year flood event could generate 1,200 to 1,300 CFS, posing a significant risk of overflow in low-lying areas. The study proposed various flood mitigation strategies, including channel widening and diversion options. Two potential diversion alternatives were highlighted: one on the east side of the city and another west of Highway 30, aimed at alleviating pressure on the existing system.

The council discussed the associated costs and funding opportunities for these strategies. The Minnesota Department of Natural Resources (DNR) administers a mitigation program that could provide financial support, although funds are allocated based on prioritization. The city could also seek a planning grant from the Minnesota Pollution Control Agency, requiring a 10% community match. Concerns were raised about the cost estimates for land acquisition, particularly for the proposed northern diversion, with suggestions to verify these figures against current market conditions.

The council recognized the need for public engagement, proposing a meeting to share information and gather community input. The urgency was underscored by the approaching deadline for planning grant applications, set for the end of November. The council acknowledged that a combination of approaches would be necessary to comprehensively address the flood risk.

In addition to flood mitigation, the council addressed infrastructure updates and financial planning. The waste treatment facility’s pumping systems were reviewed, with concerns about the longevity and repair costs of the pumps, some of which have been non-operational. Regular maintenance was emphasized to extend pump life, and community education efforts were planned to highlight the costs associated with neglect.

Library and city maintenance updates included completed window repairs and carpet cleaning, with plans for regular maintenance moving forward. The 2025 Street Improvement Project was also discussed, with additional streets being included, increasing the projected budget from $2.6 million to $3.1 million. The council assured that storm sewer funds would cover debt payments without additional resident charges.

Insurance rates emerged as a pressing financial topic, with a reported 13% increase. The council considered immediate budget adjustments, coinciding with the open enrollment deadline in November. A sidewalk improvement project along Highway 30 was also highlighted, with upgrades in compliance with the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA) being funded by the Minnesota Department of Transportation (MnDOT). Despite some resident dissatisfaction, the council clarified that the five-foot sidewalks were designed to minimize tree removal.

The council approved a technology upgrade for the meeting room, allocating up to $1,000 for equipment to enhance public access to meeting information. The Economic Development Authority’s (EDA) approval of the sale of a lot in the Homestake subdivision and two grants for local improvements were also swiftly endorsed.

Budget discussions included challenges with the current ambulance service billing provider, with a recommendation to switch providers by the beginning of the year for potentially increased revenue. The City Administrator’s report included updates on the Property and Casualty Insurance renewal and the historical designation of the Adils building.