The most discussed location was Lakeside Village Edition, where a resident, T. Anderson, voiced concerns about the necessity of proposed sidewalks on Village Lane. Anderson questioned why sidewalks were needed in what he described as a non-throughway with adequately wide streets, expressing frustration over the development’s progression. He stated, “I guess I’m a little unhappy with the way this development has been taking place.” In response, city representatives explained that city code requires sidewalk installations whenever curb and gutter improvements are made, referencing a 2005 development plan that included such infrastructure.

The conversation expanded to address zoning concerns, with Anderson asserting that changes in zoning had impacted his property value and living conditions, a claim countered by the Community Development Director. The director maintained that zoning had not changed since the area was initially platted and that the original development agreement allowed for higher density housing. Ultimately, the council moved to order the improvements, passing the motion unanimously while retaining the ability to revisit project considerations if needed.

In another notable discussion, the council considered amendments to the I-1 zoning district and temporary sign regulations. The proposed zoning amendments aim to accommodate smaller properties within New Ulm’s grid pattern, with the Planning Commission having unanimously recommended approval. These changes include defining “grid lot” and “grid pattern” and adjusting setback areas to facilitate development. Temporary sign regulation amendments were also reviewed, with limits set on the number, size, and duration of temporary signs, alongside provisions for residential developments.

Further business addressed a conditional use permit request for a new indoor commercial entertainment venue on North Third Street. The proposed facility, offering activities like axe throwing and rage rooms, received unanimous support, contingent on compliance with city noise regulations and internal activity constraints. Parking availability and potential noise impacts were highlighted, but the Planning Commission’s conditions and the owner’s awareness of these issues were noted.

The meeting progressed to approve plans for the airport fueling system upgrade and apron expansion project, part of the 2025 Capital Improvement Plan. This initiative seeks to address maintenance issues with current fueling systems by constructing above-ground tanks and creating a separate access drive for fuel delivery trucks. Funding involves a 95% cost share from federal, state, and city sources. The council endorsed the plans and set a bid date, pending grant approvals, with a council member affirming the importance of maintaining airport facilities despite resident noise concerns.

Additionally, agreements regarding the development of former Airport Road property were addressed. The council approved resolutions related to accepting assessments and waiving appeal rights as part of the property’s return to private use. The agreement with Melvin Shugal outlined conditions for assessment payment within five years, tied to specific development milestones.