0:28The council granted approval to Gog Rental Incorporated’s proposal to transform an office space into a recreational venue with axe throwing and smash rooms, despite concerns raised by a local resident about potential noise and increased traffic. The facility, which plans to operate within a General Industrial District (I2), aligns with zoning regulations but required a conditional use permit due to its unique nature. Chad Ois, representing the business, assured the council that noise levels would be minimized and that operational aspects would comply with city noise regulations. The venue plans to utilize street parking and has secured additional parking arrangements with a neighboring property.

Public feedback during the meeting included a supportive yet cautious comment from resident Molly Jacobs, who stressed existing traffic issues and potential noise disturbances. Jacobs sought clarity on operational hours, prompting the council to confirm that the venue would operate from 3 PM to 8 PM on weekdays, 10 AM to 8 PM on Saturdays, and 10 AM to 5 PM on Sundays. The council, satisfied with the applicant’s assurances, voted favorably on the proposal, recognizing the unique recreational opportunity it presented.

35:11Another focal point of the meeting was the proposed amendments to the city’s temporary signage regulations. The council initiated a public hearing to address the need for clearer guidelines, particularly after recent incidents raised questions about the adequacy of current rules. The amendments would clarify the size, location, and duration of temporary signs across all zoning districts. They aim to improve enforcement and eliminate ambiguity, with specific stipulations such as limiting temporary signs to one 30-day period within four months and prohibiting temporary signs from being illuminated in business districts.

1:33:27The council also considered zoning amendments for cannabis businesses, following Minnesota’s legalization of adult use cannabis. The city attorney outlined the local government’s role in defining use types and zoning for cannabis-related activities. The council explored potential zoning districts, including B2, B3, and B4 commercial areas, where cannabis retail could be permissible. They also discussed the implications of conditional versus outright permitting, with a preference expressed for conditional permits to allow for greater oversight as the industry evolves.

In addition to these discussions, the council approved a simple lot division proposal and addressed procedural matters related to cannabis zoning. The meeting concluded with considerations for a tax abatement program to stimulate residential development and a brief acknowledgment of community contributions by outgoing council member Kate Marco.