Newbury Conservation Commission Deliberates on Dam Removal and Ecological Restoration Projects

The Newbury Conservation Commission convened remotely to discuss various environmental projects, with attention given to the proposed removal of a dam on Locken Road aimed at restoring fish runs. During the meeting, topics included compliance with conservation standards, flood zone regulations, and the impact of construction projects on local ecosystems. The commission also addressed concerns regarding flood zone compliance and the preservation of historical sites.

50:06A focal point of the meeting was the ecological restoration project involving the removal of a dam on Locken Road, intended to enhance fish migration and ecological balance. The project team has completed all necessary regulatory reviews, although the state’s 401 Water Quality certification is still pending. The commission clarified that the issuance of their order of conditions was not contingent upon this certification. Discussions emphasized the importance of erosion control and the potential impact on the Byfield Water District’s wells. The project team assured that the dam’s removal would not alter downstream water levels or affect the wells. The commission stressed the need for clarity on the Byfield Water District’s concerns and expressed a commitment to ongoing communication regarding the project’s implications.

0:07The commission also deliberated on a Request for Determination of Applicability (RDA) for property renovations on Plumbush Downs. The applicants proposed expanding a dwelling near a salt marsh, which raised concerns about increased impervious surfaces and compliance with local regulations. Mary Rimmer pointed out that the project’s expanded scope required a Notice of Intent rather than an RDA. The commission emphasized the need for accurate documentation and calculations to assess environmental impact, particularly regarding water runoff and impervious surfaces.

34:12Another topic was the proposed construction on High Road, where the plan involved rebuilding an existing barn on a new foundation while preserving historical materials. Bill Holtz provided updates on scaled-back changes to the project, which initially included a larger addition and new driveway. The revised plan involved no footprint increase, aligning with Historical Commission guidelines to maintain the roofline. The commission addressed erosion control and the need for Board of Health approval, while awaiting technical comments from the Department of Environmental Protection (DEP) before closing the hearing.

1:40:44The commission also addressed a notice of intent for 80 Northern Boulevard, where the applicant seeks to demolish a dwelling and construct a new home in a flood zone. The commission emphasized the need for a site visit and detailed information on the project’s impact on the environment, particularly concerning dune encroachment and vegetation loss. Abutters expressed concerns about the environmental implications, advocating for a collaborative solution. The commission decided to continue the hearing to gather more information and ensure compliance with environmental regulations.

1:06:22In addition to these discussions, the commission reviewed an ecological restoration project at the William Forward Wildlife Management Area, which involves habitat restoration and invasive species control. The commission requested clear documentation and a site plan to understand the project’s scope and ensure compliance with conservation standards.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: