The most notable topic of discussion was the development of a pathway intended to connect various segments of the town, targeting a northern segment leading to the train station. Currently in the early design concept stage, the proposed path will likely follow the power line corridor along the west side of Route 95, extending through an underpass at Scotland Road. The committee is exploring alternative routes through Martin Burns and along an abandoned railroad track leading to the commuter rail. The Massachusetts Wildlife Management has expressed concerns about a multi-use path in Martin Burns due to wildlife management sensitivity, prompting the committee to reconsider design options.

The project funding for the pathway is budgeted at approximately $300,000, sourced from previously allocated resources made available by adjustments in the southern segment’s design. The firm KDOS has been selected to assist with the project, leveraging their familiarity with Massachusetts Department of Transportation (Mass DOT) requirements to develop high-level cost estimates and engineering plans. The committee is considering the creation of a volunteer-based organization to aid in the pathway’s maintenance, which would alleviate the potential burden on the Department of Public Works.

In tandem with pathway planning, the committee is revisiting the town’s open space and recreation plan, last updated in 2017. The committee discussed aligning their goals with those of the recreation committee, focusing on enhancing communication and collaboration to address the town’s recreational needs comprehensively. Concerns were raised about the previous action plan’s relevance, with some members criticizing it for being overly broad and lacking applicability to Newbury. The committee aims to create a more concise and focused document, emphasizing community input and realistic goal-setting.

Survey data analysis was a focal point, with the committee underscoring the importance of grounding goals in public participation results. Members are compiling responses to survey questions to identify community priorities, which will inform the action plan. The committee plans to present a draft plan to boards and committees for feedback by November 18th.

The discussion extended to the recreation committee’s responsibilities, particularly concerning outdoor recreation needs. There was a suggestion to collaborate with the recreation committee to evaluate survey responses and integrate findings into the master plan. Members acknowledged the recreation committee’s limited oversight, primarily focusing on fields and lacking broader authority over public recreational activities. The need for clear communication and coordination between committees was emphasized to avoid conflicts and confusion regarding field usage.

Additionally, the committee addressed logistical concerns, including meeting schedules and communication strategies. A proposal was made to return to meeting on the third Tuesday of each month, with alternative dates considered to accommodate upcoming events. The committee is refining its communication approach.