The main topic of concern during the meeting was the roadway design for a new multifamily development on Central Street, referred to as Bfield Heights. The design’s compliance with safety standards and local ordinances was intensely scrutinized. A key issue was the maximum cover over a septic tank, which was noted to be approximately five feet, exceeding the three-foot standard typically interpreted to include the riser. Discussions were held about potentially lifting the tank or lowering the finished grade to meet the standard, with the developers asserting that such modifications were manageable.

Another focal point was the design of the roadway curves, which did not meet the 200-foot radius requirement set by the subdivision code, offering only 75 feet on two curves and 125 feet on others. Developers argued that the road, being privately owned and maintained, was adequate for safety as the local ladder truck could navigate it successfully. They referenced AASHTO requirements. The fire chief’s memo was cited, confirming the road layout’s compliance with fire safety codes, which gave the board some reassurance regarding emergency vehicle access.

Lighting within the development was another point of discussion, with proposed minimal lighting aimed to maintain a rural feel while ensuring pedestrian safety. Concerns were raised about whether the lighting was sufficient, especially at intersections and key locations. The developers committed to consulting a lighting engineer to ensure compliance with dark sky regulations and address safety concerns.

Additionally, the board reviewed the project’s septic system details, focusing on the pump design and potential issues during pump failures. The developers explained their design included duplex pumps with an automated switch mechanism to mitigate such issues, and they expressed openness to providing further details to address concerns raised.

Alongside the roadway and infrastructure discussions, zoning amendments scheduled for the upcoming town meeting were addressed. An update on zoning recodification work was provided, outlining efforts to streamline the process for the meeting slated for May 5. Public hearings are planned for January and February to facilitate community outreach and education on the proposed amendments. The board’s input will be instrumental in deciding which proposals advance.

The meeting also touched on affordable housing requirements within the development project. The MCMOD bylaw mandates that 10% of the multifamily units be deed-restricted as affordable. Discussions revolved around ensuring these units are constructed in coordination with market-rate units, with a stipulation that all affordable units must be sold before the last four market-rate units. The board deliberated on potential complications in managing the lottery for affordable units if the buildings are constructed in phases, citing an example from Sterling, Massachusetts, where simultaneous construction of all units simplified management.

Concerns about landscaping and its impact on neighboring properties were also raised. Residents expressed worries about potential wind throw from trees near property boundaries, which could affect homes with large windows. The board suggested involving a landscape architect to address these concerns and recommended meetings between the applicant and neighbors to agree on a landscape design that benefits both parties. Adjustments to the landscape plan were discussed.

Discussions emphasized the importance of obtaining necessary approvals and maintaining open communication with these entities, particularly concerning the egress route and road alignments.