The topic of cell service improvement was at the forefront of the meeting, driven by the necessity to enhance public safety. The board recognized the critical nature of ensuring that residents can make emergency calls, citing the inability to do so as a significant public safety issue. This matter, although previously discussed, had not been prioritized amid other issues. The board contemplated elevating the urgency of this project above more administrative concerns, such as parking regulations.

Three potential sites for new cell towers were identified: the Department of Public Works (DPW) facility on High Road, the Triton campus, and a parcel owned by Triton off Elm Street. However, each site presented challenges. The DPW site was limited by its small size and proximity to residential homes, raising concerns about the visual impact. The Triton campus faced opposition from the school committee, and the Elm Street parcel was deemed unsuitable due to its potential impact on nearby residential areas. The board expressed discomfort with imposing such infrastructure on neighborhoods, with one member voicing that it seemed inappropriate to burden a neighborhood with a cell tower.

Technological advancements, particularly small cell technology, were also discussed as potential alternatives. This technology allows for equipment to be placed atop existing telephone poles, though the permitting process remains unclear. Installations within public rights of way require a select board permit, while those outside necessitate a special permit or site plan review from the planning board. The board acknowledged the need to update regulations to reflect these technological changes, potentially requiring consultant funding.

In addition to cell service, the board’s discussions extended to housing strategies, focusing on Accessory Dwelling Units (ADUs) and inclusionary zoning. ADUs are permitted in residential zoning districts but face size restrictions. The board considered establishing a special permit bylaw to allow ADUs in non-residential areas and address scenarios like duplexes. The relationship between ADUs and affordable housing initiatives was emphasized, with historical barriers to inclusionary zoning measures highlighted, such as the absence of an affordable housing trust. Suggestions were made for regional collaboration to pool resources for housing development and for encouraging developers to proceed with affordable housing projects.

The meeting also addressed the concept of starter home districts, which would permit smaller homes on smaller lots under Massachusetts General Law Chapter 40Y. Concerns about septic systems were noted, and it was projected that any proposal would not reach the town meeting in the upcoming spring. The ongoing development of the town’s master plan and its implementation was another focal point, with discussions on ensuring it remains active and does not become a dormant document. Regular meetings between the planning board and the select board were deemed essential for accountability and progress.

Municipal facilities, particularly the leasing of the town hall and fire department, were scrutinized for their financial implications. The board highlighted the need for a long-term vision regarding municipal facilities, advocating for a holistic approach that includes all necessary services and departments. The necessity to reengage the community in the concept of a new municipal building was discussed, with past challenges including public perception and financial concerns.

The board also explored the potential for a private well bylaw to enhance drinking water safety, particularly in light of contaminants not covered by current state standards. Collaboration with local water districts was considered essential to ensure consistent regulations. The conversation acknowledged the complex regulatory environment surrounding water supply and safety, with private wells sharing groundwater sources with public water systems.

Concluding the meeting, the board emphasized the importance of community engagement and the need for ongoing dialogue with various town committees to advance planning objectives effectively. The necessity for early and ongoing communication with the community to foster understanding and support for proposed initiatives was underlined, reflecting on past town meetings where insufficiently vetted proposals faced rejection.