Newbury Select Board Approves Significant Community Development and Accepts Multiple Grants

In a recent meeting, the Newbury Select Board made several decisions, including approving a development project that includes significant land donations to the Green Belt, accepting numerous grants that benefit both town security and infrastructure, and handling various budgetary and administrative matters.

18:29A major highlight of the meeting was the approval of a development project by Belgar Realty Trust. This project was particularly noteworthy due to its community-oriented benefits, most prominently the donation of half the land to the Green Belt. This contribution will enhance public access and improve the property by providing a new driveway leading to parking and trails while maintaining the agricultural character of the land. The development was discussed as having received all necessary approvals, and it stirred excitement for its potential to preserve agricultural activities, such as cornfield farming. This project was a focal point of the meeting.

0:07In addition to the development project, the board addressed several grants during the meeting. An MC AGP cyber security awareness training grant was accepted, emphasizing the importance of preparing town staff to recognize and defend against potential cyber threats. This training is crucial in an era where phishing scams and other malicious activities continue to rise. An IT representative shared insights on test threats conducted throughout the year, which resulted in low rates of staff engaging with phishing attempts.

Further, the board accepted two $20,000 grants, one aimed at securing structural gear for firefighters and another for the Newbury Historic Schoolhouse roof replacement. The latter grant was particularly impactful as it reduced the town’s expenses for the roof replacement from $55,000 to $35,000, allowing $65,000 to be returned to free cash. These grants reflect the board’s ongoing efforts to secure external funding to alleviate municipal budget constraints and improve local infrastructure.

The board also managed a series of administrative tasks, including the approval of ten one-day liquor licenses for events hosted by the Byfield Community Arts Center, scheduled from March to May 2025. These events, featuring various artists and bands, had their documentation in order and were collectively approved without objections. Business license renewals were also addressed, with approvals granted for Jerson Studios and Dancing Goats Apothecary.

On the topic of old business, the board revisited a resubmitted 61A notice concerning the potential sale of property on Orchard Street. After ensuring proper service and communication with various departments, it was confirmed that no municipal interest existed in the property, leading the board to waive its right of first refusal. This decision was made after clarifying that a public hearing was not required for this waiver, though the planning board had already vetted the matter in relation to proposed housing developments.

18:29The board also engaged in discussions surrounding budgetary concerns, particularly the Essex County Retirement budget, which had experienced an increase due to retirement assessments. Despite fluctuations in past fiscal years, current numbers were deemed stable, though concerns about future educational assessments and their implications on staffing were raised. This highlighted the necessity for fiscal prudence amid increasing costs.

Additionally, updates were shared regarding a collaboration meeting with Northern Essex Community College, where discussions centered on transitioning to a fully integrated school model. This initiative is expected to provide more opportunities for students and cost savings for participating towns. The board is anticipating a report from the Don M. Institute, with an executive summary already provided and the full document expected by the end of the month.

Concerns about the educational facility’s sewer system were also raised, with discussions on whether to replace or restore parts of the system under capital improvement costs associated with the existing contract.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly:

Trending meetings
across the country: