The primary focus of the meeting was the proposed alterations to the pavilion structure, which had been a topic of ongoing debate due to its visibility from a key viewpoint in the town. The applicant presented new photographs and a revised design featuring louvered planks fixed at a 45-degree angle, intended to provide a 50% openness on the gable ends of the pavilion. This design aimed to facilitate airflow and light passage while offering some protection from the elements. However, the board was divided on whether these changes were minor or major, with discussion centering on the design’s impact on the pavilion’s intended open atmosphere.

One participant expressed dissatisfaction with the louver concept, suggesting that it deviated from the anticipated design, which was expected to resemble a “board and batten” scenario. The participant argued that the proposed louvers created a “wall-like” effect, contrary to the desired open pavilion atmosphere. This sentiment was echoed by another board member, who noted that the current design appeared to block light, further contributing to the perception of a solid wall rather than an open structure.

The board’s discussion also highlighted concerns about the applicant’s understanding of the board’s specifications, with one member expressing reluctance to continue reviewing proposals that did not meet these expectations. The board suggested that the applicant consider alternative designs, such as a board and batten approach, to better align with their vision for the space. There was also a detailed examination of the functionality of the pavilion, with questions raised about how well the design would deflect rain and glare. Suggestions included potentially extending the roofline or incorporating an overhang to enhance both aesthetics and functionality.

Despite these concerns, the board agreed to grant a continuance to allow the applicant additional time to explore new design options. It was determined that the applicant would return with multiple design renditions for further review. The date for this continuance was set for December 18, with an understanding that any revised proposals should be submitted by the Thursday preceding the meeting.

In addition to the pavilion discussion, the meeting also touched on a request for a special permit by Michelle Lonzelo from 25 Harvard Way. The applicant sought relief from specific zoning bylaw sections concerning an increase in footprint and height for a renovation project. This project, which included an expanded deck, a screened-in porch, and a roof deck, had been previously approved with conditions. However, the applicant requested a continuation to the next meeting on January 15, 2026, which was unanimously accepted by the board.