Newbury Select Board Navigates Complex Zoning Issues

In a recent Newbury Select Board meeting, complex zoning issues took center stage, with the board navigating the intricacies of special permits, non-conformities, and the potential impact of construction projects on neighborhoods and the environment. Key discussions involved requests for special permits and findings for various properties, with attention given to the potential demolition and reconstruction of structures, as well as the merging of lots.

One of the major points of interest was the request for a special permit for the construction of a detached accessory apartment on a property located on High Road. The applicants, Brendan and Jillian, outlined their plans to ensure that the proposed structure would adhere to zoning requirements. The board and public raised concerns about access and oversight of the new unit, specifically regarding the implications of a separated driveway. The applicants reassured the board of their commitment to maintain visual oversight and connectivity with the primary dwelling. The board requested additional details, including a comprehensive utility plan and documentation of any changes.

Another topic was Douglas Des Shane’s request for a special permit finding for relief from certain zoning bylaws, enabling the construction of a new single-family dwelling. The board deliberated on the project’s adherence to dimensional requirements, except for an increase in height over the existing structure, which necessitated a special permit finding. The board decided to draft a favorable decision but opted to keep the public hearing open for further documentation.

The reconstruction of an existing property, aimed at addressing non-conformities and enhancing the property’s aesthetics and functionality, prompted a careful discussion. The presenter detailed the proposed changes, while questions arose regarding the impact on neighboring properties and the environment. The public expressed concerns about the potential precedent set by the reconstruction project and its alignment with the Plum Island Overlay District’s objectives. The board member clarified the district’s regulations and the evaluation process for proposed developments.

An issue involved a property on Northern Boulevard, with the applicants seeking to demolish a non-conforming structure and construct a new single-family dwelling. The proposed building aimed to reduce existing structural non-conformity and maintain the lot’s size, with an emphasis on improving the property’s appearance. Concerns were voiced about the project’s impact on the dune, which the Conservation Commission would consider. The board assured that any conditions would be based on the Commission’s decision, and the public hearing invited comments from neighboring property owners.

A proposal at 8 and Forom Way involved the demolition of a two-family house, lot merging, and an addition to the existing house. The board scrutinized the proposal’s impact on neighborhood conformity and the Plum Island Overlay District. Discussions ensued about the height of the current roof and the need for clear documentation. Despite some reservations, there was expressed confidence in the project’s timing and approvals.

The board also addressed a notice of appeal concerning a zoning enforcement decision deemed legally deficient, continuing the hearing to allow for the submission of supplemental materials. Additionally, a request for an extension to a comprehensive permit decision for a development project was discussed due to delays related to legal issues with the Conservation Commission. The applicant provided a construction timeline and readiness to commence work, but the board requested further documentation before granting the extension.

Note: This meeting summary was generated by AI, which can occasionally misspell names, misattribute actions, and state inaccuracies. This summary is intended to be a starting point and you should review the meeting record linked above before acting on anything you read. If we got something wrong, let us know. We’re working every day to improve our process in pursuit of universal local government transparency.

Receive debriefs about local meetings in your inbox weekly: